Update: See "Observation" below.
"Just a good, uh, replica." I have not ever seen that footage.
Here it is: Rotten Apple 72 by Iamaphoney.
_____________________________________________________________________
Observation: The picture below is from the cover of the vinyl E.P. "Amoeba's Secret" by Paul McCartney, which has been nominated for two grammy awards. The back cover features a semi-completed Wordsearch puzzle with information about the record.
The last row of letters shown in this frame from Rotten Apple 72 is interesting. It is actually the 9th row of the puzzle. As you can see by my copy below, the letters in the ninth row are: E O V O B M I C A U S E N N L If you take the Letter 1 "E" and then go 2 letters, you have "V" and then 4 letters, you have "I" and then 8 letters you get "L." Okay, so that Rotten Apple 72 (7+2=9) and Row #9, and letters 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 making the word "Evil." Don't you just love randomness?
___________________________________________________________________
Observation 2
"Really, that's out of the past, that." This sentence shown visually in Rotten Apple 72 is dialog from the "Let It Be" sessions. Here is some context:
George: (???)... really making a film now
Ringo: mmm...
Paul: ...what you're saying. Yesterday, it's good.
George: (???)
Paul: It's like the castle paints. Well, you start from
nothing. `Cause, you know, we started from nothing, and it'll end up
as a T.V. show. And then I always sort of...
Ringo: (???)
Paul: (???)
[crossfade]
John and Paul (singing): ... she said she's traveling on the one
after 909.
Paul: O.K. Alright.
George: Should do it.
Paul: Oh yeah, should. I think that...
John: No, no. I've got a...
Paul: That's one of the first ones. Really, that's out of the past,
that.
John: (???) change the words a bit (??)
Paul: But, no, it's great. One after 909.
Paul: (??)
Paul: She's on a train...
John: Yeah, he goes to the station...
Paul: ...and he sort of...
Paul: ...and he goes back and finds he got the wrong number, so...
George: Wrong location.
John: To rhyme with station, you know.
Paul: That's great. Railman said you got the wrong location.
Well...great. (???) saying you should that for years. (???) you know,
Mike, you don't understand about these things, you know.
John: (??)
Paul: Yeah
John: (???) could do other things.
John and Paul (singing): Woke up in the morning, I don't feel blue.
'Coz I know, I've got you.
Get the funny feeling, all day and night.
Get the funny feeling, you don't treat me right.
Should I read your letter, and then I know
Well, I felt much better
Because I know you love me so.
Paul: (???) (singing) Because I know you lo-o-ove me so.
Paul: and we'd always just (singing) Because I kno-ow you lo-ove me
so.
John and Paul (singing): Woke up in the morning, I don't feel blue.
'Coz I know, I've got you.
Get the funny feeling, all day and night.
Get the funny feeling, you don't treat me right.
Should I read your letter, and then I know
Well, I'd have felt much better
Because I know you love me so.
________________________________________________________________
And here is some footage of Paul McCartney at HMV today in London. He appears to be bigger than life.
566 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 566 Newer› Newest»Paul said he was evil!
Paul said he was evil!
Oh brother.
If Paul McCartney, composer of "Martha my Dear" and most of the prettiest melodies of the 20th century (and most sentimental, to boot) is evil, we're all in trouble.
Yeah I love these gullible morons who look to Paul McCartney as the face of evil. They will be the first people lining up to take the mark of the beast.
OMG! Phoney would love Nityananda Das! Maybe he IS Nityananda Das.
Unlike some of the people here, I have found Mike to be a very nice person. The fact that he apologized also speaks well of him. I think we can all take a page from his book and be a little more civil towards one another, especially at this time of year.
OMG...yeah he said he was sorry...after making some of the most immature comments on this page. and people wonder who the "trolls" are that seem to sound familiar to the kinds of things he says.
Even when Paul takes great pains to be edgy, let alone "evil," he still comes off as pretty squeaky clean. Lennon, too, although he knew how to promote his edgy side, was still, in the end, nearly as sentimental as Paul.
Maybe, just maybe, we get another video if we do.
Do you really need another one? Just watch the first hundred again. I've said it before: RA is a perpetual motion machine. A soap opera. All teasers no delivery. Never moves forward. Never goes anywhere. The comments here are more interesting, although they've about run out of steam.
Paul is an old guy and hopefully will live to a ripe old age but once he finally croaks these dorks will begin hunting for a new pop star to call the antichrist and blame the world's problems on. Since I would surmise that they would be too terrified to pick a Hip Hop star, I nominate Rick Astley.
OMG! Phoney would love Nityananda Das! Maybe he IS Nityananda Das.
Of course he would and it's no big shock that Geoffrey Guiliano is aware of this blog and IAAP's videos.
The full interview is here:
www.vnn.org/editorials/ET9909/ET10-4699.html
It's a famous haox story about the poisoning of an Indian guru who names his murderers when you a play a tape of the event backwards. Gee whiz if it didn't turn out to be faked. Who would have thought?
God damn you Mike.
MikeNL=Sean Lennon
Anonymous said...
MikeNL=Sean Lennon
December 22, 2008 4:38 PM
how did you find out!
Paul is Deod!
Dead
Paul is Dead!
So a day before the new Iamaphoney video, Tafultong who runs the Iamaphoney blog gets an e-mail from controversial Beatle author Geoffrey Giuliano about a new John Lennon book, the same Geoffery Giuliano who was involved with a notorious phony reverse speech hoax, meanwhile that new Iamaphoney video prominently features John Lennon and it goes without saying that the crux of Iamaphoney's entire series is...oh don't tell me now...reverse speech!
I would say these two know each other.
Glad I could help.
Sam Spade
Yeah, the possible Giuliano connection was bantered about some time ago . . .
That would explain the "Phoney" part.
I don't suppose anyone actually LISTENED to the clip, did they? Not only is it nearly impossible to hear anything BUT "Paul is dead, and I'm evil", but the 3:35-3:40 portion of the song sounds like complete gibberish when played forward anyway. Just thought I'd point that out considering some of you are too lazy to compare Phoney's clip to the actual song.
For the record, I don't think McCartney is dead or evil. Of course I don't. But I think it's very interesting that he would deliberately insert a comment like that into his new album. It's probably just him having a laugh over the RA series.
the 3:35-3:40 portion of the song sounds like complete gibberish when played forward anyway.
he says something like:
every part, every part, here right now...
"But I think it's very interesting that he would deliberately insert a comment like that into his new album"
If you think that sounds deliberate then you are out of your mind. Almost all studies have shown that backwards recordings reveal more about the people listening for messages than the songs themselves. If you go into a backwards recording thinking that you will hear something, you will most likely hear it - given that the multiplicity of interpretations that inevitably come from listening to gibberish.
Sounds likes gibberish . . . if anything, he might be saying "I'm a Beatle" not "I'm evil"
"I don't suppose anyone actually LISTENED to the clip, did they? Not only is it nearly impossible to hear anything BUT "Paul is dead, and I'm evil""
"considering some of you are too lazy"
"Of course I don't"
More typical Jude crap... Who pisses in your wheaties every morning, Jude? Why are you always an asshole?
You know, the skeptics might come off as "haters," but in fact they (we) are performing an invaluable service. Blind superstition, manipulation of facts, guilt by association (among other examples) left unchecked, is just as sinister as any satanic coven.
It's probably just him having a laugh over the RA series.
Too bad Phoney doesn't realize it's a joke.
Wait, now Jude doesn't believe Paul is dead either? What happened to everyone in the past few months? Did Phoney's videos have a reverse effect? I thought "The McCartney Myth" was supposed to be "shattered" a year ago. Somehow, the "Iamaphoney" myth was the only thing shattered.
What does jude believe? What minute of the day is it?
I know, Taf. I know. You like the editing.
I suppose one could argue that they really liked the production values of the Nazi rallies without caring much about the actual point of the rallies themselves. "Love the Wagner and tight production."
I'm not saying you are the Neville Chamberlain of RA, but it is an interesting parallel to consider.
I still think you should just rename the blog and do your own thing. Facts come out differently in text than they do with the emotional elements of varispeed and slo mo. Those are just show biz illusions that don't merit discussion.
So we are all nazi's ?
You're like 1930s Germany if you believe in conspiracy theories fed to you through carefully scripted propaganda (knowing how easily some people fall for that sort of thing).
Hitler's the guy who said, "What luck for rulers that men don't think."
Why is anyone still here? Oh, right....it is really just two or three people posting, under blogger accounts and as anonymous. And it is those two or three people that feel the need to proclaim Phoney has risen from the ashes with this new fabulous video, which is just more of the same old crap. Sorry to disappoint you Jude and Mike, your new video isn't all that. Nice try, but this whole RA nonsense is pretty much over. Oh I know, it doesn't matter and you won't stop, but hey, we all need a hobby.
then why are you here? You obviously know.
when the bus gonna take you away? take you away...
Why are we here?
We are the conscience of the series.
For there is nothing that is hidden that shall not come to light.
That, and the football game is over.
overtime!
till we get some truth..
I am however delusional.
a fuck-bump. fuck shit.
that gibberish is "Sun King" in a way that it sounds the same forwards and backwards.
I moved from being on the fence to PIA/PWNR some time ago.
And yet...
That's quite a startling departure from 5:46-5:51 with Jane Asher to 5:52-5:54 with Linda Eastman.
It makes me wonder if, for some unknown reason, "a good replica" wasn't used for certain photo shoots.
Go ahead, stone me.
65if2007 said...
Go ahead, stone me.
December 22, 2008 11:45 PM
everybody must get stoned......
Anonymous said...
I know, Taf. I know. You like the editing.
I suppose one could argue that they really liked the production values of the Nazi rallies without caring much about the actual point of the rallies themselves. "Love the Wagner and tight production."
December 22, 2008 9:36 PM
well, there ARE people who love that 'chick' that made "Triumth Of Will"!
"Why are you always an asshole?"
I don't know, why are you?
I'm only an asshole to the people I think are assholes. The so-called "haters" that hold IAAP in such disdain are who I consider to be assholes. Not because they dislike IAAP or perceive his motives differently than I, but because of the way they act. Contrary to what they believe, this blog would be a lot more interesting if they'd spend less time insulting IAAP and insulting everyone who believes in what IAAP promotes and more time noticing the obvious.
They make the same tired, useless complaints with every new video, such as this old gem:
Iamaphoney has never presented one original, sold piece of evidence. All of his clues are lifted from NIR
This was never further from the truth than in this newest video of his, RA 72. New audio clue, and a video clip that even JoJo and Tafultong with their extensive Beatles knowledge could identify.
Another classic:
People only hear what they are told to hear. That's why Iamaphoney always tells his viewers what the backwards messages say, instead of allowing them to hear it for themselves.
But, again, that's not the case with the new video. Iamaphoney presented the audio clip without accompanying text. And sure enough, I heard it anyway and others did too. When backmasking is intentional, you don't need top be told what to hear. The naysayers, of course, pass it off as gibberish, but they tend to do that with any case of reverse speech, whether the backmasking was intentional or not.
The irony is that if IAAP did actually put the words "Paul is dead, and I'm evil" then everyone would have heard it right away. People like you are always saying that PID theorists see what they want to see, hear what they want to hear, and believe what they want to believe. Well it's the same thing on the opposite end of the spectrum, isn't it? If you are predisposed to thinking that speech reversals are sheer bunk, you'll always think it sounds like gibberish, even when it's very clear. And to me, this is the clearest Beatles-related speech reversal since "Turn me on dead man".
...that even JoJo and Tafultong with their extensive Beatles knowledge could identify.
Couldn't identify, sorry.
If you are predisposed to thinking that speech reversals are sheer bunk, you'll always think it sounds like gibberish, even when it's very clear.
That isn't true. When I was a kid, I could hear the "turn my on dead man." I don't hear what you hear in this latest video. Sounds kind of like "Beatle" not "evil." Who cares? The point isn't that Phoney doesn't do anything new, the point is that it's just more of the same. NIR and other sites are filled with other PID enthusiasts who have "discovered" their own reverse clues. That sort of thing could go on ad infinitum.
The point is that reverse clues and rabbit connections don't advance the PID cause, either for believers or skeptics.
Besides, the whole object of the RA series, according to the videomaker, was to prepare the world for a revelation, and that the Love Code will blow our minds.
Love Coda
would I lie to you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Coda_sign.svg
"But, again, that's not the case with the new video. Iamaphoney presented the audio clip without accompanying text. And sure enough, I heard it anyway and others did too"
What are we supposed to do, take your word for it? There is no evidence that anyone else has heard this other than you. And since you have already put the phrase out there, others are bound to hear it now that you have said it. That's the way these things work.
"People like you are always saying that PID theorists see what they want to see, hear what they want to hear, and believe what they want to believe. Well it's the same thing on the opposite end of the spectrum, isn't it?"
No. In any case where somebody is going against an understanding or belief, the onus is on them to prove it. In other words, if you tell me that water is not made of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, you have to prove otherwise, but I don't have to do anything - because it has already been established. The only thing PIA's are predisposed to believing is reality.
"Besides, the whole object of the RA series, according to the videomaker, was to prepare the world for a revelation, and that the Love Code will blow our minds."
True.
This is a post from NIR. Being the one who originally found this fact, IAAP did make one error in the film. This is not to say the new video is not a nice piece of work. I quite enjoyed it. I am only posting this so others may see it the right way.
"All credit to IAAP for digging this footage up - But he may have missed a trick.
Regarding two other Clips from RA 72...
1 - The Audience member questioning John about PID (excerpt from the Dick Cavett Show)
2 - The Homeless Guy (excerpt from Imagine)
Here is a link from You Tube of another excerpt from the same Dick Cavett Interview
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=aYg-UjN88Cc&feature=related
Check out the guy who is in the studio Audience and asking John a Question (six seconds in).
Reading the You Tube comments I can see I am not the only one who thinks this is the exact same homeless guy who then turns up in 'Imagine'."
"
What are we supposed to do, take your word for it? There is no evidence that anyone else has heard this other than you. And since you have already put the phrase out there, others are bound to hear it now that you have said it. That's the way these things work."
Christ, then if that's the way you think, how can one go about proving anything? Wake up call---people actually think for themselves and decide for themselves what they should believe. Just because I seemed to have heard it before anyone else doesn't make it any less valid. Do you think IAAP just randomly chose to reverse a snippet of that song from the new Fireman album? He must have heard something in it, and I'd bet anything that it's exactly what I heard because it falls right in line with his two core philosophies (A) Paul is dead, and (B) Paul is evil (yes, I do think he is implying that in the RA series, but he also implies that the Beatles were a force of good, as well).
Whenever one person hears something that others didn't, it's funny to see how everyone reacts. Some people are interested, others feel sheepish for not having noticed it themselves and yet others become enraged, and set up straw man arguments in attempt to derail the clue or the person who presented the clue.
Bottom line: If something sounds kind of funny and has lots of noises covering it, people no hear. You put the words on the screen, people hear. Therefore it is silly to argue against this practice. It would also be silly of IAAP to at this point upload a version of this video with subtitles added to it, because then his opponents would resort to the age old argument that he is trying to force-feed meaning where there is none.
I just find it incredibly funny that the one time he doesn't subtitle the backwards message, I heard it the very first time and, yeah, to be honest, I guess no else has. I thought Mike would at least comment on it. C'mon Mike, I know you hear it. It's at least what IAAP wants you to hear. Without any clue to what I was supposed to be hearing, I heard it right away. And it's not as if it's something I wanted to hear, since I don't really think Paul is dead (I don't know if I've ever been totally convinced that he was dead; I've only had suspicions, doubts, and trails that led nowhere).
then why are you here? You obviously know.
December 22, 2008 9:55 PM
Why am I here? I have been here from the start. Then it became obvious that there wasn't anything to see here, but I kept a slight interest. I just popped back in after seeing there was to be a new IAAP video. After seeing it, I again feel there is nothing to see here; same old, same old, just new clips. For me, it has been one disappointment after another. As far as I am concerned, the people here promoting IAAP are the ones that are in on the whole deal. Of course, that is my take on how you stick up for them. When people come down on IAAP, you take it awfully personal; to the extent that they are personally offending YOU. IAAP has shown nothing substantial to prove PID or the "Love Code". Sorry Jude, but what you consider as clues, I don't see it. You can argue the point if you like, and I am sure you will; call me a h8ter, I don't care. Why even post here then? Because I have a right to my opinion just like you.
"
No. In any case where somebody is going against an understanding or belief, the onus is on them to prove it. In other words, if you tell me that water is not made of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, you have to prove otherwise, but I don't have to do anything - because it has already been established. The only thing PIA's are predisposed to believing is reality."
J. Guildersleeve, izzat you?
-----No. In any case where somebody is going against an understanding or belief, the onus is on them to prove it. In other words, if you tell me that water is not made of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, you have to prove otherwise, but I don't have to do anything - because it has already been established. The only thing PIA's are predisposed to believing is reality.-----
I think that Paul McCartney is probably alive and was probably never replaced in any real sense of the word.
Above, I speculate on the possibility that someone else was used in some photo shoots, as we know happens frequently with actors in productions staged for TV or movies.
But I believe that, for the most part, it's always been the same Paul McCartney.
My belief is based on two things: 1) regardless of the changes that the man has undergone over the years, he always seems to have the same set of teeth, and I don't see how teeth could be duplicated; and 2) the virtual impossibility of creating such a hoax and keeping it secret for over 40 years -- requiring the universal cooperation of friends, family, peers, etc.
But I'm not a forensic scientist, so my belief that Paul is still alive and was never replaced is an educated guess.
I wouldn't call the supposition that Paul is alive the bio-identity equivalent of "Water = H2O".
Again, it's an educated guess.
Your definitions of "understanding" or "belief" or facts that have "already been established" or "reality" are just synonyms for conventional opinion.
"Conventional opinion" isn't scientific fact in the same sense that "Water = H2O" is a scientific fact.
Otherwise, it would be an established fact that the earth is the center of the universe and that the sun revolves around it.
Why am I here? I have been here from the start. Then it became obvious that there wasn't anything to see here, but I kept a slight interest. I just popped back in after seeing there was to be a new IAAP video. After seeing it, I again feel there is nothing to see here; same old, same old, just new clips. For me, it has been one disappointment after another. As far as I am concerned, the people here promoting IAAP are the ones that are in on the whole deal. Of course, that is my take on how you stick up for them. When people come down on IAAP, you take it awfully personal; to the extent that they are personally offending YOU. IAAP has shown nothing substantial to prove PID or the "Love Code". Sorry Jude, but what you consider as clues, I don't see it. You can argue the point if you like, and I am sure you will; call me a h8ter, I don't care. Why even post here then? Because I have a right to my opinion just like you.
I don't take it personal if you think that IAAP hasn't done anything substantial to prove PID. But if you hop about like some of these chimpanzees do, slinging feces at Iamaphoney and recycling the same old posts again and again I just might call you an idiot.
I don't take it personal if you think that IAAP hasn't done anything substantial to prove PID. But if you hop about like some of these chimpanzees do, slinging feces at Iamaphoney and recycling the same old posts again and again I just might call you an idiot.
December 23, 2008 8:59 AM
Your chimps are no different than IAAP recycling the same old crap over again and again. So why not call him an idiot as well?
Your definitions of "understanding" or "belief" or facts that have "already been established" or "reality" are just synonyms for conventional opinion.
"Conventional opinion" isn't scientific fact in the same sense that "Water = H2O" is a scientific fact.
Otherwise, it would be an established fact that the earth is the center of the universe and that the sun revolves around it.
Do my eyes deceive me, or did Guilders just get served?
Your chimps are no different than IAAP recycling the same old crap over again and again. So why not call him an idiot as well?
Well I would have called him an idiot..if I had only watched the first twenty seconds of the video. When I saw the McCartney Eye and the Egyptian hieroglyph bird thingy I rolled my eyes and thought "not this again". Equally unimpressive was the fact that the RA Team has not yet upgraded to widescreen, even though everyone else on YT is. But then I heard that speech reversal, and saw the creepy clip of McCartney calling himself a good replica, and for just a few moments I felt that excitement that I used to feel when watching a new installment in the Rotten Apple series. For you, I suppose, the thrill is dead. Maybe you never felt it to begin with. I don't know, you tell me.
"Christ, then if that's the way you think, how can one go about proving anything?"
Well, perhaps you can tell which of our core beliefs are derived from listening to music backwards? The answer is simple: none. Do you honestly believe that evidence is found in a guy saying, "Trust me you idiots, it's there, and if you can't see it, that's your problem". Unfortunately, evidence has to be irrefutable - which is why no one in any serious study or investigation looks to backwards music to prove anything. This is just pure Cartesian logic and you can't possibly believe conspiracy theories are above the standard.
You are never going to prove anything as long as you are not looking for evidence. Evidence is not found in what someone may or may not have said backwards in a song - that proves nothing - that's why the PID/PWR crowd look there - that's all you've got. If you had some kind of real proof (ie., someone who was in a position to know comes out and says something, some sort of documentary evidence was found) then you wouldn't be wasting your time with backwards songs.
"Otherwise, it would be an established fact that the earth is the center of the universe and that the sun revolves around it.
Do my eyes deceive me, or did Guilders just get served?"
Your eyes deceived you. Conventional opinion can be fact until someone proves it wrong. I think it is a fact that Paul McCartney is alive and well and the same person he always was. If we can't accept as a factual premise that people are who they say they are, then there is just no such thing as any factual premise, and we might as well just pull up the covers and wait for the apocalypse to come.
Furthermore, when Galileo and Copernicus revealed that the world was not the center of the universe - they didn't just say it and suddenly conventional opinion changed. They realized that the onus was on them to prove it - it was not on the people who believed that the Earth was in the center. This is why concrete irrefutable evidence was provided.
But then I heard that speech reversal, and saw the creepy clip of McCartney calling himself a good replica, and for just a few moments I felt that excitement that I used to feel when watching a new installment in the Rotten Apple series. For you, I suppose, the thrill is dead. Maybe you never felt it to begin with. I don't know, you tell me.
December 23, 2008 9:06 AM
OK, but how does any of that reinforce IAAP's agenda? IF what you hear is definitely there, and I say that because some people have a harder time hearing such things than others, what does it prove? Paul has a sense of humor? He likes to play too? It is just more of the same, but some slightly new material. Do you know what I mean?
Well, perhaps you can tell which of our core beliefs are derived from listening to music backwards? The answer is simple: none. Do you honestly believe that evidence is found in a guy saying, "Trust me you idiots, it's there, and if you can't see it, that's your problem". Unfortunately, evidence has to be irrefutable - which is why no one in any serious study or investigation looks to backwards music to prove anything. This is just pure Cartesian logic and you can't possibly believe conspiracy theories are above the standard.
You are never going to prove anything as long as you are not looking for evidence. Evidence is not found in what someone may or may not have said backwards in a song - that proves nothing - that's why the PID/PWR crowd look there - that's all you've got. If you had some kind of real proof (ie., someone who was in a position to know comes out and says something, some sort of documentary evidence was found) then you wouldn't be wasting your time with backwards songs.
You're always going on about proof. All of the arguments between you and CommenterGV on IAAP's Youtube page seem to center around proof---or at least, your end of the argument. But really, who said anything about proof? When was "proof" the issue? I never said that Paul saying "Paul is dead and I'm evil" proved anything, just that it was interesting. And for that matter, when did IAAP ever claim that he had proof, or that the proof for PID was in his videos? Because if he ever did, I'd sure as hell like to know.
OK, but how does any of that reinforce IAAP's agenda? IF what you hear is definitely there, and I say that because some people have a harder time hearing such things than others, what does it prove? Paul has a sense of humor? He likes to play too? It is just more of the same, but some slightly new material. Do you know what I mean?
I think the message itself plays into Iamaphoney's agenda, which seems to be to sell people on the idea that Paul is dead and he (the replacement) is evil.
You're always going on about proof. All of the arguments between you and CommenterGV on IAAP's Youtube page seem to center around proof---or at least, your end of the argument. But really, who said anything about proof? When was "proof" the issue? I never said that Paul saying "Paul is dead and I'm evil" proved anything, just that it was interesting. And for that matter, when did IAAP ever claim that he had proof, or that the proof for PID was in his videos? Because if he ever did, I'd sure as hell like to know.
December 23, 2008 9:16 AM
If he has no proof, then what is the point? I believe the majority of people following this have been led to believe that Phoney has set out to expose Sir Paul as a fake. The real Paul is dead, and he has proof. If that is not the case, most would like to know.
I'm sticking to my guns. Phoney said he was "preparing the world for a revelation" and that he "cracked the Love code." He said he told Apple about it, and he wanted to claim his prize. He has also said, in so many words, the Paul is Dead. He also seems to believe the Beatles were practicing Thelemite magick because they did a few reverse things (they did a lot of forward stuff, too). Anyway, as for the little snippet of gibberish, Taf did the same thing with the Ringo clip, saying, "HOLY SH** THIS IS IT!!"
People that are the most into Phoney seem to get the most excited by the smallest things, such as the little blip of light from the fireman video that is supposed to look like the moustache from Pepper (c'mon, tell me you wouldn't be embarrassed to show that to the Royal Society)
I think the message itself plays into Iamaphoney's agenda, which seems to be to sell people on the idea that Paul is dead and he (the replacement) is evil.
December 23, 2008 9:19 AM
This goes along with my point. To say Paul is dead and the replacement is evil just doesn't cut the mustard. One can say anything. For it to be taken serious and be believed, it must be proven as true. If it can't be proven as true, this whole series is no different than any other PID theory.
He is out to expose Sir Paul as a fake, I really think he is. I say this as someone who read his earliest posts, way back when he first introduced himself to the PID community at TKIN!. Can you think of any other motives that he might have? He isn't making a profit from these videos. He hasn't made headlines (unless you count his "Now and Then" video, which a few Beatles news outlets picked up on and reported as an actual outtake from the Anthology sessions). And if he was just screwing with people's heads, well, you'd think the fun would have gone out of that a long time ago, what with no one picking up the last four suitcases and everything.
The thing is, he may be out to prove that Paul is dead or a fake or whatever, but as you've pointed out, he hasn't gotten there quite yet. He once said that his greatest piece of "evidence" was one that he was holding back until the day that he gets to talk to Paul McCartney face to face. I'll be waiting to see if that day ever comes.
"But really, who said anything about proof?"
I was actually directly answering your question, which was this: "if that's the way you think, how can one go about proving anything?"
This goes along with my point. To say Paul is dead and the replacement is evil just doesn't cut the mustard. One can say anything. For it to be taken serious and be believed, it must be proven as true. If it can't be proven as true, this whole series is no different than any other PID theory.
December 23, 2008 9:26 AM
And so far, all we have is a person or groups idea that Paul is dead, and a bunch of manipulated videos of pictures and interview clips that are suppose to sway everyone into believing this is true. I can get the same thing from NIR, TKIN, etc. Phoney was suppose to be different. He was suppose to be the inside man with the proof; the revealer of "The Revelation". A revelation is not so if it is based entirely on assumptions. There must be proof of something.
-----Conventional opinion can be fact until someone proves it wrong.-----
"Can be"? You stopped just short of saying "is" because you realized that you would paint yourself into a corner by saying "is".
Well, who decides whether "conventional opinion" IS or IS NOT a fact?
Is "conventional opinion" a fact when applied to Paul McCartney and not a fact when applied to the universe?
Who made that decision? Conventional opinion is conventional opinion. Nothing more and nothing less.
-----I think it is a fact that Paul McCartney is alive and well and the same person he always was. If we can't accept as a factual premise that people are who they say they are, then there is just no such thing as any factual premise, and we might as well just pull up the covers and wait for the apocalypse to come.-----
I think that Paul McCartney is alive and -- for practical purposes -- has always been the same.
But identity theft -- especially in the technological age that we live in now -- is among the most pervasive and expensive crimes that is committed.
I don't think that the issue of an individual's identity need be relied on with the same certainty as Newton's Laws of Physics as a means of retaining sanity or preventing the Apocalypse.
-----Furthermore, when Galileo and Copernicus revealed that the world was not the center of the universe - they didn't just say it and suddenly conventional opinion changed. They realized that the onus was on them to prove it - it was not on the people who believed that the Earth was in the center. This is why concrete irrefutable evidence was provided.-----
Certainly. However, the point is, that, as it turned out, conventional opinion in that respect was wrong and had always been wrong.
It had always been wrong long before Galileo and Copernicus had ever been born.
That the earth revolves around the sun was established fact long beforehand and had been so long before Galileo and Copernicus had occasion to prove it.
So their proof was only required for the purpose of educating the civilized world as to the truth.
Their proof was NOT required to make the sun's concentricity the truth.
"He once said that his greatest piece of 'evidence' was one that he was holding back until the day that he gets to talk to Paul McCartney face to face. I'll be waiting to see if that day ever comes"
If IAAP seriously believed he had something important to reveal, he would dangle evidence around and wait years to unveil it. Investigations and studies are not like an Entertainment Tonight episode where they present the teaser at the beginning and wait to the end of the show to give you the story. IAAP would take his cues from the world of law or science rather than shlockly television shows if he had anything really important to say. And the "Paul McCartney interview" thing is just another smart move - he's put the ball in someone else's court who will never return it - therefore, he is no longer responsible for actually revealing any evidence. He is set himself up so that he can't be wrong - that is the act of the charlatan.
He once said that his greatest piece of "evidence" was one that he was holding back until the day that he gets to talk to Paul McCartney face to face. I'll be waiting to see if that day ever comes.
Does IAAP want to kill Paul? I ask because I care.
And so far, all we have is a person or groups idea that Paul is dead, and a bunch of manipulated videos of pictures and interview clips that are suppose to sway everyone into believing this is true. I can get the same thing from NIR, TKIN, etc.
First of all, I hope you're not referring to the interview clip in RA 72. It doesn't seem to be taken out of context at all. Wait until someone identifies the source of the clip before crying "fraud", OK?
Nothing is Real doesn't do the manipulated photo thing. It wouldn't get past JoJo, and I could imagine RedLion banning someone for forging photo evidence.
Besides, certain people over there are so thick that they wouldn't need manipulated photos to convince them that Paul is Dead. More often than not they are the ones claiming that certain "official" Beatles photographs are, in fact, manipulated! See the "JPM Alive?" thread for a good laugh.
And for that matter, when did IAAP ever claim that he had proof, or that the proof for PID was in his videos? Because if he ever did, I'd sure as hell like to know.
Yeah, he did rant a lot on NIR and he said he had proof and people had to "connect the dots." Phoney was very fundamentalist NIR about Paul being Dead and evil and all that.
I think he realized, after reading many skeptical posts and other refutations of his videos, that he actually didn't have real proof. He maybe even changed his mind sometime this year like everyone seems to have done.
Does IAAP want to kill Paul? I ask because I care.
Maybe Paul wants to kill Paul.
65if, I think we agree here more than you think - we may just have different ways of expressing it rhetorically.
"Is 'conventional opinion' a fact when applied to Paul McCartney and not a fact when applied to the universe?"
I see what you are saying. I guess that I should have said "believed to be a fact". You are correct that everyone believing that the earth was the center of the universe did not make it so.
"But identity theft -- especially in the technological age that we live in now -- is among the most pervasive and expensive crimes that is committed"
Okay - but technological identity theft is surely different than the one that you are describing, which is not pervasive at all. Yes, you can't necessarily trust that the person who give you a credit card is the person who rightfully owns that credit card - but there is certainly a distinction between these two cases, no?
"Certainly. However, the point is, that, as it turned out, conventional opinion in that respect was wrong and had always been wrong"
Absolutely, but my only point is that in order for conventional opinion to change, irrefutable evidence needed to be presented.
I'm not sure if we necessarily disagree on anything anymore. I suppose the question I could put to you is, do you think Paul McCartney has to prove that he's alive and not a replacement? Do you think that everyone who has this charged put towards them, should have to prove otherwise?
Maybe Paul wants to kill Paul.
Wut?
Why?
Where?
It isn't just about Paul died and someone took over. It is an entire worldview. For the replacement to have takent place requires a massive conspiracy, so the Paul is Dead part is just a front for the larger Tavistock or NWO theory. It reminds me of the Intelligent Design momvement, which was really a front for the Creationist movement. The idea was to get the design theory into the classroom (as though it was a scientific theory), and then from there it was a Trojan Horse to the biblical account of creation.
That's why hardly no one at NIR or at RA confines their ideas to PID or PWR. It branches off into the occult, the NWO, UFOS, and all the rest.
So, to summarize: Paul is Dead is not the actual underlying issue at hand. It is almost universally an idea that is symptomatic of political or religious fundamentalism (or both).
Happy Holidays, Jude. Happy Holidays, Tafultong. Happy Holidays everyone.
God rest ye merry Beatlemen, let nothing you dismay.
Happy Faulidays!
(couldn't resist).
Phoney puts the "mental" back in fundamentalism
So to recap, Paul wants to kill himself in Walt Disney World in 1971 over the misheard lyrics of Numa Numa?
-----I suppose the question I could put to you is, do you think Paul McCartney has to prove that he's alive and not a replacement? Do you think that everyone who has this charged put towards them, should have to prove otherwise?-----
No and no. He doesn't "have" to do any of that.
But the McCartney situation is a little different than that of the average Joe.
Because I think that what we might still disagree on is Paul's responsibility for the PID rumors.
I think that the rumors were deliberately started by the Beatles for reasons that have yet to be ascertained and may never be ascertained.
Many of the clues are in the imaginations of others, but I'm convinced that some clues are genuine.
I have a feeling that you disagree with that.
But that's my belief and so my feeling is that if there are still lingering suspicions that Paul McCartney is not what he seems, he himself is partly to blame for them.
He COULD put an end to them (for the most part) by allowing himself to be fingerprinted or whatever.
I've always thought that it would be a great promotional gimmick, part serious, part tongue-in-cheek -- a big media affair on Abbey Road (let us say) in which a fingerprint expert of impeccable credentials takes a fingerprint sample from Sir Paul and publicly compares it to the readings on an old passport.
OK, that wouldn't satisfy EVERYBODY. Some conspiracy theorists would find something wrong with the examiner or the way in which the prints were taken and the examination was made, etc., but for the most part, something like that would settle the issue.
But I think that McCartney enjoys the "mystery" and enjoys playing along with it. I think that there are legitimate PID clues in "Free as a Bird" and "Real Love" -- meaning that he was still playing along as recently as 1995.
I think that I MIGHT hear "By the way, Paul is dead" in "Rinse the Raindrops", meaning that he was still playing along as recently as 2001.
So rather than perceiving a need to put an end to those rumors, McCartney seems to enjoy keeping the flame ignited.
If I'm right about that, then he himself is largely to blame for the results.
Maybe to the extent that he no longer wants to play along, he should take responsibility for correcting the record.
But the trouble is that after the pillow has been broken open and the feathers scattered to the wind, it's hard to gather them all back and put them back into the pillow...
I think that there are legitimate PID clues in "Free as a Bird" and "Real Love" -- meaning that he was still playing along as recently as 1995.
Well, I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't a few references to PID in the videos for Free as a Bird and Real Love, because PID is a famous part of Beatle lore. But I don't know that Paul is playing along on that score, more like the production team that made the videos is playing along.
"I have a feeling that you disagree with that"
Sort of. The examples you give are all after the conspiracy was invented. If The Beatles or Paul inserted these things in songs after 1969, then I think we can conclude that these are more jokes rather than "keeping the flame ignited". I think that if there was a serious concern that a great amount of people would take these jokes seriously (and, I think we can conclude, that hardly anyone has) then they wouldn't have been made. Paul himself jokes about the PID rumour all the time - the best one is probably in "Maybe I'm Amazed" that is played in The Simpsons episode that he did a voice for - "Oh, by the way, I'm alive".
-----OK, that wouldn't satisfy EVERYBODY. Some conspiracy theorists would find something wrong with the examiner or the way in which the prints were taken and the examination was made, etc., but for the most part, something like that would settle the issue.----
This is wishful thinking. Obama releasing his birth certificate wasn't enough for a lot of people, they thought that he photoshopped it..you know, because if he was part of a huge conspiracy he could'nt just have a real one made...but yeah, I also think that Paul would probably be a huge laughing stock for doing so, after all, PID is limited to mostly a few websites, it's not a commonly known tale.
The first thing i heard was "Paul is dead, *gibberish*"
Then i imported the sound in audacity sound editor, and after listening carefully i did hear *and i'm evil.*
because english is not my main language, it's hard for me to discover new backward masking clues.
it's not proof of ANYTHING... but still it is very interesting.
i think a bigger clue is; *no, no, sam. it ain't no anagram* in the booklet of electric arguments.
and as for RA72, i think the biggest clue for that is the new video footage of paul saying "i'm just a good replica"
M.
-----This is wishful thinking. Obama releasing his birth certificate wasn't enough for a lot of people...-----
But it IS enough for most people. That's my point.
-----they thought that he photoshopped it..you know, because if he was part of a huge conspiracy he could'nt just have a real one made...but yeah, I also think that Paul would probably be a huge laughing stock for doing so, after all, PID is limited to mostly a few websites, it's not a commonly known tale.-----
I don't know about that. Younger YouTube and MySpace types have re-discovered the Beatles, including the "Paul is dead" legend.
Yeah, Paul would be a "laughingstock" for actually proving himself to be himself, but he could treat it humorously and laugh along with everyone else.
I don't think that this sort of endeavor would make him any more of a laughingstock than some of his earlier projects.
What's the name of that idiot video in which he and Linda are dressed in trenchcoats and he puts his hands in his pockets and wags the trenchcoat up and down as if he was a flasher?
He could make a big humorous production over the whole thing, even while undergoing a real fingerprint examination.
I'm sure that it wouldn't hurt his reputation, and I imagine that it would be no less profitable an undertaking than his other projects.
Point well taken - I would probably rather watch McCartney get his fingerprints taken than listen to the Wild Life album again. With that in mind, I don't think that there is any evidence found to suggest that he should have to do this. And furthermore, the PID/PWR is nowhere near at the level of popularity you seem to think it is. Even as conspiracy theories is go, it's pretty much scraping the bottom of the barrel.
So to recap, Paul wants to kill himself in Walt Disney World in 1971 over the misheard lyrics of Numa Numa?
OBVIOUSLY! Who wouldn't?
Also, because he's EVIL.
I disagree. I think there are legitimate PID clues between 1966 and 1969 - i.e., BEFORE PID became a phenomena in and of itself (i.e., "turn me on, dead man, the Sgt Pepper drum, "Paul is a dead man, miss him...", etc.)
-----With that in mind, I don't think that there is any evidence found to suggest that he should have to do this.-----
Of course, he doesn't HAVE to do this, but I've given an example in which he could profit from doing so, just as he presumably profits from his other productions.
If McCartney perceives no NEED to prove his identity, then it means that -- as you say -- the PID rumor is no big deal to him in the first place.
And it could also mean -- as I have said -- that he sometimes enjoys playing along with it and finds it more profitable to do that.
If all that is true, then the Rotten Apple videos shouldn't be regarded as any sort of "threat" to him.
Yes, it's always possible that given the message of those videos, they could inspire some Chapman type to take action.
But the fact is that this is the price that we pay for living in a free society.
You alluded to one of the rumors swirling around Obama, but the Oval Office has been inhabited by a Bush for twelve of the last twenty years, and the rumors swirling around the Bushes are no less lurid than those swirling around Obama or McCartney.
A physical threat to an elected official is potentially more calamitous than one to an entertainer. Yet, for the most part, the more violent forces are apparently kept at bay.
Well, again, backwards music reveals nothing - one generally has to be conditioned to hear those things. I agree that "number nine" backwards sounds somewhat like "turn me on, dead man" but if you could even explain what that phrase even means or what that has to do with Paul, please do. Similarly, out of the three examples you gave, only one (I'm So Tired) directly mentions Paul, and that is definitely that clue is nearly impossible to hear clearly. If you listen to that example, what you are interpreting as "Paul" in "Paul is a dead man, miss him miss him miss him", is in fact two syllables long. So, clearly, you are doing a significant amount of interpretation there. These clues fail to suggest anything other than interpretation and at best (and this is a stretch) coincidence.
The Greatest Wings Song That Never Existed
"As far as I am concerned, the people here promoting IAAP are the ones that are in on the whole deal."
it would seem that way.
"Of course, that is my take on how you stick up for them. When people come down on IAAP, you take it awfully personal; to the extent that they are personally offending YOU"
This is a very good observation. Yet is so predictably enjoyable these outbursts by Jude. Jude, you take this all so personally, and I for one am glad you do.
I really hope that you never change, and am always pleasantly surprised when you return after leaving "for good"
Most of the time,i have a difficult time understanding where you perceive these slights against you are coming from. i can very easily understand those who have characterized you as some one who suffers from paranoia, and someone who imagines it all being about you.
I have a friendly wager with someone else that frequents this blog. The wager is if you will stick around until 2012, or if you will finally burn out?
I have faith in you Jude, please don't ever change. My bet? That you will be here until 2012.
Can we stop calling them
"Jude hissy fits"
and call them instead
"Jude's Greatest Hits"
?
In the spirit of Christmas I second that nomination!
Jude's Greatest Hits!
what the hell? are we voting people off the island here now? why the big brother references?
i think a bigger clue is; *no, no, sam. it ain't no anagram* in the booklet of electric arguments.
True Mikey. That was in answer to the Fireman is no Mason thing from the promotional site. That particular anagram (I am the risen son of man) is probably the most intriguing clue I've seen to date. It's not really a PID clue, but it's an extremely bizarre message, if that really was an anagram.
I wouldn't trade Jude for anyone. Hell, I would vote MikeNL off first.
Mike said....and as for RA72, i think the biggest clue for that is the new video footage of paul saying "i'm just a good replica"
M.
December 23, 2008 11:55 AM
How is that a big clue? Paul himself has cracked jokes from the beginning when asked about "Paul is Dead" and the so called PID clues. Granted, that particular interview isn't one that has been mentioned here before, but it is not anything new.
Have some people been voted off the PID/IAAP island?
Whatever happened to Aja?
what happened to mojo?
where is faulconandsnowjob? never got to the bikini challenge.... shucks
So the question is, will Jude be the last one on IAAP island?
where is faulconandsnowjob? never got to the bikini challenge.... shucks
December 23, 2008 1:09 PM
I think Faulcon left and came back as Puzzled on NIR.
Jude and MikeNL are some of the more colorful characters here on IAAP island to be sure. Let's hope they decide to stick around. This place wouldn't be the same, really!
Jude and MikeNL are some of the more colorful characters here on IAAP island to be sure. Let's hope they decide to stick around. This place wouldn't be the same, really!
December 23, 2008 1:11 PM
This place wouldn't exist if it weren't for them. They are IAAP.
Any one of the characters wearing the "star trek red shirts?" Always the first to go...
Paultherevelator?
i think the revelator is still in business
How is that a big clue? Paul himself has cracked jokes from the beginning when asked about "Paul is Dead" and the so called PID clues. Granted, that particular interview isn't one that has been mentioned here before, but it is not anything new.
December 23, 2008 1:07 PM
Excellent point.
Mike said....and as for RA72, i think the biggest clue for that is the new video footage of paul saying "i'm just a good replica"
Guys, I don't see why statements made by the Beatles mocking the PID thing are supposed to be clues.
PHoney likes to take their mocking statements, slow them down, and make them appear to be ironic. Heck, he did it with Dennis Kucinich. You can make any statement seem ominous with special effect. How about the Beatles first press conference? Imagine slowing down Lennon's statement "We can't sing. We can't play. We can't do anything" and then freeze-framing his expression.
Creepy!
i think the revelator is still in business
December 23, 2008 1:13 PM
His account still exists, and his last video December Dream is still up, just set to private. The other videos have been removed. Maybe he is tired of playing.
Yeah jude! we arent laughing at you! we are laughing WITH YOU!
That particular anagram (I am the risen son of man) is probably the most intriguing clue I've seen to date.
Though most of Phoney's stuff is reverse clues, that Risen Son of Man clue gave me the willies. I have to wonder how he could have known about that unless he had some inside info. That's why I thought he was part of a Fireman promo, maybe through a company subbed out to do viral work. With this new video, I don't think he's part of any promotion any more.
i think the revelator is still in business
December 23, 2008 1:13 PM
His account still exists, and his last video December Dream is still up, just set to private. The other videos have been removed. Maybe he is tired of playing.
December 23, 2008 1:17 PM
Did mikeNL or Jude vote him off the island during one of the challenges? if they did, that isn't fair!
PTR was the only one who knew how to jump the bog, screw the hog, crap a log.
Could come in handy for later challenges....
here...
on IAAP island
Really!
what ever happened to that guy... ? what was his name? intolerable bastard? insensitive bastard? something bastard anyway... was he wearing the red star trek shirt, or did mike or jude vote him off the island?
what ever happened to "U"?
or Bern and Harold?
Mr. Pottymouth?
nosdrahcirbocaj?
Anonymous said...
nosdrahcirbocaj?
December 23, 2008 1:24 PM
he is showering now. no more cheese smells, from anywhere. Teenage angst paid him well
wtf? is this "REUNION" day here on IAAP island??????
" Anonymous said...
wtf? is this "REUNION" day here on IAAP island??????
December 23, 2008 1:26 PM"
Well..... it IS NEXT LEVEL NOW ISN'T IT????????? Got to see who is here, form some new alliances.
Find out who we can call for 50/50 or phone a friend.
Who wants to be a PID millionaire?
Anonymous said...
Yeah jude! we arent laughing at you! we are laughing WITH YOU!
December 23, 2008 1:18 PM
OH NO YOU DIIIIIINT!
See?????!?!?
See what Christmas vacation and a new iamaphoney does???
The kids are all home, not in school, clogging up the blog.
"The kids are all home, not in school, clogging up the blog.
December 23, 2008 1:30 PM"
Oh thats right! Paultherevelator could "clog the blog" too!
That special power was his best! And will certainly come in handy!
where is sanguine111??????
Anonymous said...
where is sanguine111??????
December 23, 2008 1:32 PM
He is still making comments on the iamaphoney videos, and sometimes in the comment section. Still kicking it "texty" and trendy. You know... ol skool.
from #72
sanguine111 (1 day ago)
that guy at john's always bugged me-can't tel
CTW was paul's?c'mon
been waitin 4 sum fine ram revs 2 sho-1:59;headles w/deth-1:55;best crowley impresion[keep pausin,u'll get em]
hope mikey does a slo down[lots o lilthings 4 fans]
"paul is dead and dreaming"
"Oh thats right! Paultherevelator could "clog the blog" too!
That special power was his best! And will certainly come in handy!
December 23, 2008 1:31 PM"
Yeah, the revelator sure could rhyme!
Remember when he left, for good?
Said he was sorry for "clogging the blog, jumping the frog, etc."
I hope he returns!
"where is faulconandsnowjob?"
Spreading misinformation on the "Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him" site and deleting my posts that reveal how it is misinformation.
Look here's the deal. No one seems to GET this for some reason.
Iamaphoney promised he was going to expose Paul McCartney as a fake and got all the occultists thrilled. As time went on he failed because in truth he had nothing but he at least failed in an interesting way.
Paul is not dead.
Like Jude said before Iamaphoney is sincere in his efforts. The mentally ill are always sincere.
Paul enjoys PID and plays with it every once in a while to appear "hip". Why this goes over everyone's heads I'll never know. Every see the cover of "Paul Is Live"? This can't be disputed. It comes up all the time. He loves it. Iamaphoney would never have been able to gather up all those clips of McCartney talking about it if it wasn't something Paul rather enjoyed discussing.
Despite Iamaphoney's boasts about McCartney's evil and his evil influence the Fireman album is a dud, the sales are terrible. I would expect the evil Satanic/NWO/Thelemite Magick to at least put out a product that people want. "Memory Almost Full" dropped off the charts pretty quickly too when it came out.You can get it used at Amoeba for about 3 dollars.
The fact that 65IF has listened to solo McCartney and is a staunch anti-vegan and comes to this blog frequently to rap about his love of meat eating and dislike of McCartney for being a vegan speaks VOLUMES about McCartney's imaginary "hold" on listeners.
I was hoping for a wrath of G_d rant from Jude today. You know, the way Moses would have done.
blogger Jude said...
" JUST STOP IT ALREADY, GODDAMN IT.
I wasn't ranting before, but I suppose I am now. Just shut up. With every annoying little post you make I try to imagine how God could have allowed such a disgusting human being such as yourself to live."
Damn you! Damn you all to Hell! Damn you dirty apes!
that clip you used was from Planet of the apes, not the ten commandments.
You are not even trying anymore, are you?
At least you got the actor correct. Charlton Heston.
The only way you're going to take this suitcase away from me is to pry it from my cold dead hands!
- the Actor
IAAP Heston
"Anonymous IAAP "actor" Heston said...
The only way you're going to take this suitcase away from me is to pry it from my cold dead hands!
- the Actor
IAAP Heston
December 23, 2008 1:48 PM"
I know right!?
Saw the quick flashes of suitcase stuff in 72 with the actor and thought oh sh*t, here we go again with the suitcase. glad IAAP Heston did not prevail and we GOT BACK TO THE CROWLEY!!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Jude's wrath of G-d rant said...
I was hoping for a wrath of G_d rant from Jude today. You know, the way Moses would have done.
damn you yhshvh10! damn you to hell!
You got a problem with Moses?
Isn't he DEAD!!?!??!?!??
OMG!!!!!!!!
THE CLUES ARE EVERYWHERE!!!!
Can't you just take Hankkah off yashiva? enough with the comments.
It's spelled Hanukkah. Please at least respect that. I don't misspell Christmas.
Yes but you DO misspell JESUS don'cha?
G-Bus
Jebus
Geeebus
Anonymous said...
You got a problem with Moses?
Isn't he DEAD!!?!??!?!??
OMG!!!!!!!!
THE CLUES ARE EVERYWHERE!!!!
December 23, 2008 1:53 PM
Charlton Heston was REPLACED!
Charlton Heston was REPLACED!
December 23, 2008 1:56 PM
Heston is STILL ALIVE!
The grim reaper was scared to go, the dude HAD TOO MANY GUNS!
I find myself skipping comments again.... oh well.. maybe we will get back to the real work we were doing even a few days ago before the rifff raffff showed up again. Came out of the wood work they did.
Xmas brings out the kids home from school.
See now, there you go yashiva! its not Xmas, its CHRISTMAS!
Well you misspelled Hanukkah!
and you misspelled yashiva.
It's yhshvh
Got to admit, impressive!
#23 - Most Subscribed (All Time) - Gurus - Israel
#18 - Most Viewed (Today) - Gurus - Israel
#35 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Gurus - Israel
#23 - Most Subscribed (All Time) - Gurus - Israel
#18 - Most Viewed (Today) - Gurus - Israel
#35 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Gurus - Israel
#66 - Most Viewed (This Month) - Gurus - Israel
#19 - Most Viewed (All Time) - Gurus - Israel
(more) (less)
#19 - Most Viewed (All Time) - Gurus - Israel
Nice!
#19 - Most Viewed (All Time) - Gurus - Israel
Nice!
Damn. Should have put my Youtube account up in Israel, then I too could be an all time Guru.
sigh.....
Those boys sure like to use the word "onus" a lot in their posts. Jude and them..
onus onus onus onus onus onus onus onus onus onus onus onus onus onus
There. Now the Onus is on you!
J Guilders started the onus
if your friends all jumped off cliffs would you do it?
if my friends were cliff divers i might... didn't think of that did you?
are they saying "onus " when they do?
Then I would certainly jump off a cliff with my friends...
ooooooooo
n
u
s
splash
I would jump off the cliff to get away from those damn dirty apes!
Charlton Heston would be proud!
Hey, seriously... what happened with the Berlin suitcase????? Says it still in circulation...
Who has the "onus" to produce the evidence?
Can we get the crack legal team of
"Faul con and snow job"
on that right away please.
Got a round of golf in a few moments.
Yeah, the revelator sure could rhyme!
Remember when he left, for good?
Said he was sorry for "clogging the blog, jumping the frog, etc."
I hope he returns!
December 23, 2008 1:36 PM
??? That wasn't the Paultherevelator.
faulconsnowjob is not a lawyer. She's a wannabe lawyer who's gleaned all of her information from reruns of The Practice and Boston Legal. When she's been pressed on details or to provide clarification or is challenged, she just vanishes.
We here at Faul, Con, and Snow Job
take the legal profession seriously. We have been protecting our clients from shapeshifting lizzards since 2008.
In rendering this fake legal opinion, please take special note that tort law in germany is much different then here in the united states. You see, Scientology has a firm hold in germany. To put it legally, they are "F*cked". That is a real legal term here in the United States. Look it up. Google that sh*t. It's true. I know, I am a LAWYER.
If that Berlin suitcase was here, the onus would be on a certain Mr. I AM A Phoney to produce the evidence. That is why he left it in Germany. To "F*ck" with us. That is a valid legal term. Look it up.
Anyways. For this "Onus" opinion, you are being billed for $2,700.
Pay me now. I too have a golf game.
See you out on the links!
Sincerely,
The Legal Team of
Faul, Con, and Snow Job
Yeah, the revelator sure could rhyme!
Remember when he left, for good?
Said he was sorry for "clogging the blog, jumping the frog, etc."
I hope he returns!
December 23, 2008 1:36 PM
??? That wasn't the Paultherevelator.
December 23, 2008 2:12 PM
That was Sir Larry.
Sir Larry Mildew said...
Just checking in again to tell you all that I am leaving. Again.
In fact you can expect me to make these types of announcements every week or so.
You all mistook me for Paul McCartney. See how wrong you were? Paul is Alive by the way. Maybe I am too. My technology is almost indistinguishable from magic!
Sorry, didn't mean to hog the blog....or flog the dog....or jump the bog.
Take care,
Sir Larry Mildew
September 28, 2008 12:08 AM
YOU GUYS ARE FAST!!!!
Surprising how no one can pull the wool over your eyes about Sir Larry/PTR and yet you believe all this crazy sh*t here.....
The Legal Team of
Faul, Con, and Snow Job
December 23, 2008 2:18 PM
Going to make a T-Shirt with that on it.. nice!
Did Sir Larry get voted off the island????? Or was he wearing a star trek red shirt???
Anonymous Anonymous said...
YOU GUYS ARE FAST!!!!
December 23, 2008 2:22 PM
Look how fast we nailed mikey on his "interview" comment from a week ago.
You think we aren't writing this sh*t down?????!??!?
well Legal team of Faul, Con and Snow Job
"If that Berlin suitcase was here, the onus would be on a certain Mr. I AM A Phoney to produce the evidence."
in order for a contract to be "legal" the name should be in all capital letters.
"Mr. I AM A PHONEY"
Knock about $2,699 dollars off your bill and I will let it slide this time.....
just once....
i missed you funny guys! makes me laugh
Is it a damn full moon or something????
Sir Larry Mildew said...
Just checking in again to tell you all that I am leaving. Again.
In fact you can expect me to make these types of announcements every week or so.
You all mistook me for Paul McCartney. See how wrong you were? Paul is Alive by the way. Maybe I am too. My technology is almost indistinguishable from magic!
Sorry, didn't mean to hog the blog....or flog the dog....or jump the bog.
Take care,
Sir Larry Mildew
September 28, 2008 12:08 AM
December 23, 2008 2:21 PM
That was fake Larry. LOL
Nope
Waning Crescent, 11% of the Moon is Illuminated
It will be full on Jan 10th, 2009.
That was fake Larry. LOL
December 23, 2008 2:29 PM
OMG!!! HE WAS REPLACED!!! THE CLUES ARE EVERWHEREEE!!!!!!
EVERYBODY PANIC!
I see Mr. Small Penis all caps is back.... the IAAP reunion tour marches on.....
yawn...
When I last checked the blog, which was an hour or so ago, there were, I believe, 276 comments. Now I see there are 366.
Let's see who's behind this, shall we?
The Greatest Wings Song That Never Existed
December 23, 2008 12:56 PM
Delete
Anonymous "Jude's Greatest Hits" said...
"As far as I am concerned, the people here promoting IAAP are the ones that are in on the whole deal."
it would seem that way.
"Of course, that is my take on how you stick up for them. When people come down on IAAP, you take it awfully personal; to the extent that they are personally offending YOU"
This is a very good observation. Yet is so predictably enjoyable these outbursts by Jude. Jude, you take this all so personally, and I for one am glad you do.
I really hope that you never change, and am always pleasantly surprised when you return after leaving "for good"
Most of the time,i have a difficult time understanding where you perceive these slights against you are coming from. i can very easily understand those who have characterized you as some one who suffers from paranoia, and someone who imagines it all being about you.
I have a friendly wager with someone else that frequents this blog. The wager is if you will stick around until 2012, or if you will finally burn out?
I have faith in you Jude, please don't ever change. My bet? That you will be here until 2012.
Can we stop calling them
"Jude hissy fits"
and call them instead
"Jude's Greatest Hits"
?
Oh, it's you! What a pleasant surprise! Just when 65if2007, JGuildersleeves and I had wrapped up a hearty discourse on the subject of PID, you show up a couple of hours later to randomly mention these imaginary hissy fits that you seem to be so fond of.
I'm flattered that you are so obsessed with me, really, but aren't you making it a bit obvious? I mean you can actually see the comment page start to dwindle away as you make your presence known every minute or two. I'm glad to see I bring you so much joy, but isn't it ironic that the very last post before your infantile tirade was merely a link to a fake Wings song, and had nothing to do with any of the negative things you so love to accuse me of?
"I was hoping for a wrath of G_d rant from Jude"
Sorry, I'm afraid you've got me mistaken for yhshvh.
"Knock about $2,699 dollars off your bill and I will let it slide this time.....
just once....
December 23, 2008 2:27 PM"
How am I to fight the shapeshifting lizards without that money mister?
you think these bullet proof bracelets are FREE?
you think this truth lasso rope is growing on trees?
you think this invisible plane is flies on smiles?
No! Wonderwomen NEEDS A NEW PAIR OF SHOES! SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!
Faul, Con and wonderwoman must have small penis! SHE IS IN ALL CAPS!!!!
Oh, it's you! What a pleasant surprise! Just when 65if2007, JGuildersleeves and I had wrapped up a hearty discourse on the subject of PID, you show up a couple of hours later to randomly mention these imaginary hissy fits that you seem to be so fond of.
I'm flattered that you are so obsessed with me, really, but aren't you making it a bit obvious? I mean you can actually see the comment page start to dwindle away as you make your presence known every minute or two. I'm glad to see I bring you so much joy, but isn't it ironic that the very last post before your infantile tirade was merely a link to a fake Wings song, and had nothing to do with any of the negative things you so love to accuse me of?
December 23, 2008 2:31 PM
hearty discourse......infantile tirade.....
What a boob.
Anonymous said...
Faul, Con and wonderwoman must have small penis! SHE IS IN ALL CAPS!!!!
December 23, 2008 2:34 PM
Faul, Con and wonderwoman comes from an island of all women. They have strap-ons there. She is HUNG like a damn horse!
hearty discourse......infantile tirade.....
What a boob.
Please, elaborate anonymous poster whom I would never, ever, EVER expect to be exact same person who writes all the same garbage about me.
Blogger Jude said...
Sorry, I'm afraid you've got me mistaken for yhshvh.
December 23, 2008 2:33 PM
Nope it was you.
From
October 12, 2008 11:38 AM
"blogger Jude said...
JUST STOP IT ALREADY, GODDAMN IT.
I wasn't ranting before, but I suppose I am now. Just shut up. With every annoying little post you make I try to imagine how God could have allowed such a disgusting human being such as yourself to live."
Jude goodness.
Please, elaborate anonymous poster whom I would never, ever, EVER expect to be exact same person who writes all the same garbage about me.
December 23, 2008 2:37 PM
You...are...a...boob.
All the time blah, blah, blah. You are always right, everyone else is always wrong. If you shit your pants and it was running down your leg, you would argue you just farted.
Biblical Jude Rant won't happen today. Just took the meds. The world is mellow. Going to listen to "Paul is Evil" on my iPod. Over and over again.
And if you question me........
CANT YOU HEAR IT!?
DIDN'T YOU LISTEN?!?
Not only is it nearly impossible to hear anything BUT "Paul is dead, and I'm evil", but if you don't you must be punished from G-D!!!
I don't suppose anyone actually LISTENED to the clip, did they?
And do you care to provide the context for that oft-provided quote?
Oh that's right, you're providing it right now. You ARE a disgusting human being, whoever you are, because you continually attack me when I never did a goddamn thing to you. Or did I? You're always too much a coward to identify yourself, so I guess I'll never know. There's no questioning whether or not this blog suffers because of you. From 270 to 390 comments in just over an hour, and it's mostly lovely little gems like: "Faul, Con and wonderwoman must have small penis! SHE IS IN ALL CAPS!!!!"
Whereas 65if2007, JGuildersleeves and I were actually talking constructively amongst ourselves. I throw words like "infantile" and "disgusting" around because they just suit you so damn well that I can't be arsed to think of anything more descriptive.
I've seen this footage. Notice how Linda and Faul appeared at once. how awkward John is shaking Faul's hand at the Sgt Pepper release party Linda 'just happened' to be at. No surprise that Linda and Yoko both came from super rich and connected 1950s-60s Westchester County families, with their extreme lsd parties and occult aspirations. No strangers to the Dakota, they wanted the beatles more than they wanted Polanski's child dead, which was alot.
I really really hope he makes it to 2012 before getting disgusted and leaving this blog. You people are hard on him.
Things just wouldn't be the same with out J-de!
We aren't laughing at him, we are .....
are we?????
The anonymous internet person that goes by the fake name Jude said....."You're always too much a coward to identify yourself, so I guess I'll never know."
Do you get it?
blogger Jude said...
"arsed to think of anything more descriptive.
December 23, 2008 2:48 PM"
There is that word again... "arsed".
Is this the really real Jude of Lennon fame, or just his webmaster??
No strangers to the Dakota, they wanted the beatles more than they wanted Polanski's child dead, which was alot.
Nice little diturbing psychotic fantasy you've got there. Iamaphoney tends to attract psychos like flies to shit. You'll feel right at home here.
"bill elliot said...
I've seen this footage. Notice how Linda and Faul appeared at once. how awkward John is shaking Faul's hand at the Sgt Pepper release party Linda 'just happened' to be at. No surprise that Linda and Yoko both came from super rich and connected 1950s-60s Westchester County families, with their extreme lsd parties and occult aspirations. No strangers to the Dakota, they wanted the beatles more than they wanted Polanski's child dead, which was alot.
December 23, 2008 2:48 PM"
Please continue Bill Elliot. I am interested in what you say.
"
There is that word again... "arsed".
Is this the really real Jude of Lennon fame, or just his webmaster??
December 23, 2008 2:51 PM"
Lots of people say, "arsed" here.
Don't they????
You don't give yourself enough credit Jude. There are a couple of people posting here about you.
1, 2, 3, 4.....can I have a little more?
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10....I love Jude.
"Arsed" is a registered trade mark of Jude Lennon and his incomparable webmaster.
Post a Comment