Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Review: Turn Me On, Dead Man



One of the most perplexing things about seeing the trailer and reading the advance promotion for this short film was the question of how they were going to tell the story of the sudden death of a member of a rock band at the peak of their popularity and the subsequent cover up in just 22 minutes. After seeing the film, I was impressed at how much ground they were able to cover in such a short amount of time.

Director Adam Blake Carver uses an effective technique of alternating between black and white and color to tell the story. With the exception of the first scene where the band's manager arrives to tell the three band members about the death of Blake, their popular bass player, all black and white scenes indicate the time when Blake is alive and all color scenes indicate the time when the band is carrying on with a replacement. This little trick is not only used effectively, but it also shows some insight into Beatles history when you think about the stark black and white "Revolver" cover versus the lavish color of "Sgt. Pepper" and "Magical Mystery Tour."

The band itself depicted in the film is not the Beatles, I think. I don't remember a band name ever being mentioned in the film. On some mock newsreel footage (that includes a couple extremely quick images of the Beatles) the four band members, who share some resemblance to the Fabs are simply referred to as Blake (Paul), John (Guess Who), Charlie (George) and Ryland (Ringo). The band members are played by Joe Reegan, David Moscow, Luke Edwards and Brian Ruppenkamp.

The original music in the film, written by Logan Metz and Lincoln Mendell and performed by the Bumblebees is based on the styles of the time period represented (1964-1968). The song snippets are adequate, but not quite up to the level of the Rutles. One song has a Beatles "Wooh" as in "She Loves You" and the John character sings in a nasal voice.

Producer and Co-Writer Tyler Knell explained, "In making the film, we realized early on that we had no interest in trying to be 100% accurate, because we knew we never would be able to break through those constraints and tell the story the way we wanted to tell it. Therefore, you’ll find that we took creative liberties wherever we could afford them."

This was a wise decision. The characters make no attempt to speak with a phony Liverpool accent and aspects of the chronology are slightly different from Beatles history so that the story can be told more effectively. In fact, Adele, a Yoko-like character played by Kalia Pamela is annoying the other members of the band in the studio as early as 1966 and contributing to the riff between Blake and John that precedes the car accident. So, apparently PID is Yoko's fault too. Yoko haters will also be pleased to hear that Adele has to use facial expressions alone to wreak havoc as she does not make a single utterance in the whole film. I hope this doesn't negatively impact Kalia Pamela's chances of playing the lead role in a movie based on the life of Alanis Morissette.



I don't think the "creative liberties" will be a problem for Beatles fans who watch this film. The main problem seems to be the attempts to be more like the Beatles. If they are going to have American accents, why put them in silly looking Beatle wigs? Why try to mimic the exact words from Beatles press conferences when the band is clearly not the Beatles? I also did not get why the surviving members of the band were told that they would honor their tour commitments immediately after a news clip reported that the band had decided to give up touring. It almost seemed like the decision to not worry about accuracy was made halfway into the shooting of the film.



Despite its flaws, "Turn Me On Dead Man" is worth having in the dark fringes of any Beatles collection. There is one aspect of the film that possibly unintentionally mirrors the contradictory and ambiguous nature of Beatles conspiracy theories. Remember when I told you that black and white means Blake is alive and color means that Blake is dead? Well there is one scene in the movie that occurs twice, once in black and white and once in color. Also just before his tragic death, Blake picks up a young woman in distress near a Volkswagon that has its emergency flashers on. The scene in the film is in black and white, but for some reason the trailer has only the flashers in color. Isn't that a lovely clue for the PID person who pays attention to fine detail and seeks to find a sinister meaning?



Coming soon: A closer look at Rotten Apple 76.

229 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 229 of 229
Anonymous said...

someone needs to put these jerks in there place

Anonymous said...

Euroblur Dude is actually in sharp focus. It is we, the sheeple, who cannot see clearly.

He's also Ian's dad.

Anonymous said...

A Hole In the Head examines the development of "modern" trepanation as used by people in the United Kingdom, the United States, and The Netherlands for the purpose of attaining a higher level of consciousness.

Anyone here from the Netherlands?

Anonymous said...

Photographer Marcello Geppetti is not euroblur. He died 11 years ago but not before taking some amazing candids of the Beatles, and Paul, in the Sixties.

Anonymous said...

Photographer Marcello Geppetti is not euroblur. He died 11 years ago but not before taking some amazing candids of the Beatles, and Paul, in the Sixties.

And he was Italian.

Anonymous said...

we have a little name for you too, jude.....

Anonymous said...

This Paul was Replaced thing is even stupider than Paul was Dead. These NIR folks are saying that the real Paul helped out on Pepper behind the scenes, etc. Well if he can help out behind the scenes why not have him phone it in, stay retired, pose for a few photos with the boys in advance? They weren't touring anymore--why even bother to replace him for a year and a half?

Anonymous said...

Furthermore, since artists control their exposure, why make a documentary and put a replacement to that daunting task of being filmed for hundreds of hours, seen close up while at work---the riskiest possible scenario for an impostor. Very few artists can sing and play live as well as their records--so why put the dude through the nearly impossible task of a live Beatle performance and live album recording--something even George Martin said was the trickiest thing they ever attempted? And yet Paul demonstrates not only his peerless live vocal ability, but shows off his bass, guitar, and keyboard playing on top of it. This is less than 2 years after he allegedly has surgery and vocal/bass/guitar lessons.

I used to teach bass/guitar and letmetelya you aren't going to find a student that could advance like that. In fact, I've still not heard any bassist/singer/writer with such keen musicality --and we've all had decades to catch up.

superimposed said...

so is the Macca circle thing Part of someone's skull?

Anonymous said...

212

Anonymous said...

so is the Macca circle thing Part of someone's skull?

Good luck with that.

Anonymous said...

LOL

Anonymous said...

LOL

Anonymous said...

LOL

Anonymous said...

LOLLIPOPS

Anonymous said...

lol

Anonymous said...

turn me on bread man turn me on

Anonymous said...

222

Anonymous said...

rotten apple 76 was a stale as moldy bread

RA76 is penicillin! for EUROblurriness!

Anonymous said...

Inside the org:4 LIBER from LEWlSCARROLL
You cared for me when I was small now brother J Ill tell them all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IL39ejD0YAA

Anonymous said...

Hey, thanks for Nutterblur footage.

You guys are catching on.

Anonymous said...

Blurry Footage: PID Seal of Approval.

Anonymous said...

As an astronomer at JPL, I can tell you that when looking for answers, we always prefer blurry telescopes to those with clear lenses. One should not trust crisp, detailed images for obvious reasons. You can't even get past security here if your photo ID isn't blurry. The same holds for comparisons of various star systems. When doing careful analysis, you want to begin with distorted and poorly scaled images; with film and video we look for at least seventh generation copies with maximum noise and artifacts. Only a stupid jr high school athlete with no knowledge of science and a drinking problem would employ control methods to ensure reliable testing.

The first time I saw a PID video I knew someone with a science background was involved. The RA series in particular exhibits all the tell-tale signs of careful research, including the maximization of bias toward a particular conclusion, which is the most reliable means of observation. The vague content, along with high levels of blurriness and logical contradiction is impressive, although it is not as incoherent as it could be.

Anonymous said...

I concur with JPL guy. The trick to getting reliable information is to accept whatever evidence confirms your hypothesis, and to ignore or discard any contradictory evidence. There are dozens early Beatles press conferences and movies where you can see Paul McCartney smoking right handed. But I know he is left handed so that evidence must be discarded as false or embarrassing. If you don't do this, the hypothesis becomes messy and difficult to prove. There are many early Beatle photos where Paul looks shorter than Lennon. Those photos are doctored. Any photo where Paul looks taller than Lennon is not doctored. This is because the Illuminati go back and doctor all the early photos to make Paul look shorter than Lennon. Now you may ask 'Why don't they doctor the photos where he looks taller?' and the answer is, you ignore that question because it causes headaches. Otherwise, you're always thinking, "Hmm, why don't the Illuminati do this, and why don't they do that?" Why do they want the clues to be obvious and then try to cover them up at the same time? Be like theologians and stop the headaches by not asking those kinds of questions.

MikeNL said...

Anonymous said...
I concur with JPL guy. The trick to getting reliable information is to accept whatever evidence confirms your hypothesis, and to ignore or discard any contradictory evidence. There are dozens early Beatles press conferences and movies where you can see Paul McCartney smoking right handed. But I know he is left handed so that evidence must be discarded as false or embarrassing. If you don't do this, the hypothesis becomes messy and difficult to prove. There are many early Beatle photos where Paul looks shorter than Lennon. Those photos are doctored. Any photo where Paul looks taller than Lennon is not doctored. This is because the Illuminati go back and doctor all the early photos to make Paul look shorter than Lennon. Now you may ask 'Why don't they doctor the photos where he looks taller?' and the answer is, you ignore that question because it causes headaches. Otherwise, you're always thinking, "Hmm, why don't the Illuminati do this, and why don't they do that?" Why do they want the clues to be obvious and then try to cover them up at the same time? Be like theologians and stop the headaches by not asking those kinds of questions.

August 8, 2009 1:37 PM

this post is awesome.

Anonymous said...

Jude you are a traitor to PID and you don't belong with us no more.

Anonymous said...

231

RockXLight said...

Yep, just call me the Benedict Arnold of Paul is Dead.

Anonymous said...

Service : Customer service ended up being good. Lovely lady on the phone possessed a pleasant approach moreover My wife and i obtained funding speedy.
Value :I really was given wonderful value due to cash loan percentage rates turned out to be exceptionally low cost.
AAA Vancouver Payday Loans 310-4088 Cambie Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2X8 (778) 785-2087 payday loans vancouver
AAA Calgary Payday Loans 1014 Macleod Trail Southeast, Calgary, AB T2G 2M7 (403) 614-4637 payday loans calgary
AAA Ottawa Payday Loans 503 Avenue Gladstone, Ottawa, ON K1R 5N9 (343) 883-1422 payday loans ottawa
AAA Edmonton Payday Loans 10223 97 Street Northwest, Edmonton, AB T5J 0L5 (780) 669-1284 payday loans edmonton

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 229 of 229   Newer› Newest»