Late last year, S3ANL3NN0N joined the fray of YouTube phony-Phonies with videos that borrowed from the Rotten Apple Series. Iamaphoney of course has released re-edits under a bunch of different accounts, and so it is difficult to tell if we are dealing with an Iamaphoney alias or an independent person. The S3ANL3NN0N videos don't seem to use the same style of editing as the Iamaphoney videos, but they certainly seem to use the same footage and music. There is a much greater emphasis on John Lennon, but the Rotten Apple Series seems to be moving in that direction too. I don't think that these videos are part of the Rotten Apple group, but I was surprised by a shadowy figure that a perceptive reader noticed on the right side of the screen a couple seconds into a recent video called "Get Back."
The John emphasis continues with the most recent video entitled, "So let it out."
Miles Denton Oliver, aka Miles Deo (Miles Miles Denton Oliver?), aka Mr. Oliver, aka Uncle Miles has entered a new phase after the exiguous Project Petticoat. My earliest memory of Miles was his initial appearance at the Nothing Is Real Forum with claims of a (censored) note containing clues to a Manson family secret (See previous blog entry).
Miles, in his current incarnation as CultureBat has produced a couple interesting videos.
The Fireman is no mason
The LOVE Case
Is Miles hinting that his secret note had more pages?
Some perceptive Grammy Awards watcher at Nothing is Real captured this glaring error on the broadcast during the list of music people who died in 2008. I hope they didn't get that photograph from Apple.
Uh, that's not Neil Aspinall. That's Mal Evans, who died in 1976 at the hands of the Los Angeles Police who believed he was threatening them with a gun. Although excerpts from his diary were published in 2005, his book "Living the Beatles Legend" has never been released. Boy, if any of us were conspiracy buffs we could have a field day with that one.
98 comments:
Regarding the photo of Mal in place of Neil; It just goes to show you how ridiculous the whole Grammy thing really is. They cant even get one photo right nevermind awarding artists that truly deserve it. Its all about the money.
I guess we are supposed to draw some sort of conclusions from this "Let it Out" video, but there is not much you can glean from video snippets of the Beatles without any context, narrative, or much else. Miles is now showing one "pie" piece, which is one third of the "Manson star" (meaning Peace sign symbol). I'm I the only one really getting tired of the lack of substance? I shouldn't expect anything, but these guys should at least make a solid statement if that's their intention.
16 EXT. "CONFIDENCE CLIMB"--DAY
PYLE climbs a high obstacle.
HARTMAN
Get up here, fatboy! Quickly! Move it up!
Move it up, Pyle! Move it up! You climb
obstacles like old people fuck. Do you know
that, Private Pyle? Get up here! You're too
slow! Move it, move it! Private Pyle, what-
ever you do, don't fall down! That would
break my fucking heart! Quickly!
PYLE freezes at the top.
HARTMAN
Up and over! Up and over! Well, what in the
fuck are you waiting for, Private Pyle? Get
up and over! Move it, move it, move it! Are
you quitting on me? Well, are you! Then quit
you slimy fucking walrus-looking piece of
shit! Get the fuck off my obstacle! Get the
fuck down off of my obstacle! Now!
More Kubrick . . . can someone just start a David Lynch/Stanley Kubrick blog already?
Anybody got that song that begins the S3AN videos on MP3?
vince
The Grammys get a lot wrong. I imagine their fact checking staff is a bunch of college interns.
Milesdeo sucks. S3ANL3NN0N sucks.
"Am I the only one really getting tired of the lack of substance? I shouldn't expect anything, but these guys should at least make a solid statement if that's their intention"
They can't make solid statements because they don't know shit. They get their jollies by playing the same game as IAAP, but they do a terrible job of it. They just want you to think they know something.
I know something but I'm not telling. Tee hee!
Tafultong said..My earliest memory of Miles was his initial appearance at the Nothing Is Real Forum..
My earliest memory of Miles is from NIR too but at the time he was chasing Phoney and warning people not to follow Phoney. Then he went into his "whatever you say I'll agree with you" phase and now he's joined the YouToobery, eh? If ya can't beat 'em.....
S3ANL3NN0N is saying that Faul is really John in disguise.
My question is: How did he alter his voice then?
Dok Shepherd, he turned like blood.
(The reversed message in CultureBat's suitcase video.)
Hmm, I wonder if that's Neil's shadow to the left of Mal? Maybe from a photo sent to them, and being clueless about the Beatles, they just assumed it was the guy next to Ringo and cropped accordingly.
jojo said...
Hmm, I wonder if that's Neil's shadow to the left of Mal? Maybe from a photo sent to them, and being clueless about the Beatles, they just assumed it was the guy next to Ringo and cropped accordingly.
February 12, 2009 5:45 PM
Most likely. These are TV guys not music guys after all.
Good article Tafultong!
Anonymous said...
jojo said...
Hmm, I wonder if that's Neil's shadow to the left of Mal? Maybe from a photo sent to them, and being clueless about the Beatles, they just assumed it was the guy next to Ringo and cropped accordingly.
February 12, 2009 5:45 PM
Most likely. These are TV guys not music guys after all.
February 12, 2009 5:57 PM
I doubt even most music fans know who Neil Aspinall or Mal Evans were. No disrespect to them but the average person can barely get the names of all four Beatles correct.
'the Star' // QUADRANT
NUMBERS // 18-28-64
If you can't understand, you don't have to.
blah blah blah, milesdeo
" 'the Star' // QUADRANT
NUMBERS // 18-28-64
If you can't understand, you don't have to."
Hike!
I don't understand, and you know what?
I don't have to! Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyaaaah.
Wait! Mal was replaced by Neil!
I read it once at TKIN!
I thought Neil was Paul. Then I thought Vivian Stanshall was Paul. Now I think John Lennon is Paul. Eventually I'll get around to thinking that Paul is Paul.
2 164 If 4 121 3 8 69 7 16 35 14 32 18 28 64 9|56 1 2 4 8
Sir Isaac Newton's Principia, Miles?
"I thought Neil was Paul. Then I thought Vivian Stanshall was Paul. Now I think John Lennon is Paul. Eventually I'll get around to thinking that Paul is Paul."
Oh wait...I am Paul!
The walrus was Paul!
Taf, talk something real. Not the same cryptic garbage-speak as "2 164 If 4 121 3 8 69 7 16 35 14 32 18 28 64 9|56 1 2 4 8"
Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica has nothing to do with this.
OH WAIT!!!! You're in on it too.
but maybe a bit of sympathy for the devil is in order.
Anonymous said...
Taf, talk something real. Not the same cryptic garbage-speak as "2 164 If 4 121 3 8 69 7 16 35 14 32 18 28 64 9|56 1 2 4 8"
Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica has nothing to do with this.
OH WAIT!!!! You're in on it too.
I wasn't being cryptic. I was trying to guess the source of the "garbage speak." But, I didn't have to understand it. I would like to be "in on it" but I can't pass the physical.
Nothing physical here.
Why would you even ping that pong? All that this website understands is extended ascii or unicode or something.
"2 164 If 4 121 3 8 69 7 16 35 14 32 18 28 64 9|56 1 2 4 8" is way too much shit to even parse when your sucking a deo-teat, playing the phoney game.
Substance, my friend. 99.8877 times out of 100 you write a descent blog. .1123 you play.
OMG!!!! I JUST HEARD RINGO SAY "I AM A PHONEY!!!!"
that SEANLENNON guy is actually named jeff. he contacted me some time ago and asked how to rip Don't Let Me Know.. so i gave him my extended mix.
then a couple of hours later i saw he added it to his video. then the next day he used my comparison mix for 1882. with the original 1882 and the iamaphoney 1882 on the left and right channel seperate.
he's very nice, but he has some wacky ideas about lennon, lol.
2 164 If 4 121 3 8 69 7 16 35 14 32 18 28 64 9|56 1 2 4 8
Sir Isaac Newton's Principia, Miles?
Just numbers to me.
LOOK
There's only one REAL person on the cover of Sgt. Pepper's cover; and the image of that person has even been altered.
miles was a sailor first
what real person, miles....?
Miles Denton Oliver said...
'the Star' // QUADRANT
NUMBERS // 18-28-64
If you can't understand, you don't have to.
February 12, 2009 6:35 PM
A for effort, miles
e = mc2
clown code
Miles Denton Oliver said...
2 164 If 4 121 3 8 69 7 16 35 14 32 18 28 64 9|56 1 2 4 8
Sir Isaac Newton's Principia, Miles?
Just numbers to me.
Yeah, that's what they said about 42.
MikeNL said...
that SEANLENNON guy is actually named jeff. he contacted me some time ago and asked how to rip Don't Let Me Know.. so i gave him my extended mix.
February 12, 2009 10:54 PM
That's what I need!
How can I get that?
vince.
PS. Mike, you know, I'm a little disappointed that, after Ben's little 'blow-up' in the van, Jack & Sun just clammed up; they should'a said, "Well, what do you WANT, you little manipulative BITCH! "
Pi 3
To Vince and Mike: I've tried based on things I've read you guys posting about but I can't get into Lost. I just think it's convoluted nonsense. I can get with Twin Peaks. I just bought the whole series on DVD after seeing episodes up on YouTube. Twin Peaks is a work of genius. There area LOT of mysteries surrounding it. Not Beatle related but better IMHO. You should start a Twin Peaks blog or fan community. I'd join that.
Mark
excellent idea!
ohhhhhmiles? where's the straw?
Vince, Jack and Sun were being whiny little bitches. Jack actually said he should kill Ben after what he just did to Kate (what? Make her cry?). Are you and I watching the same show? How can you defend Jack and Sun? I for one was sick of their bullshit and was glad Ben finally told them off.
"Substance, my friend. 99.8877 times out of 100 you write a descent blog. .1123 you play.
OMG!!!! I JUST HEARD RINGO SAY "I AM A PHONEY!!!!"
At any given time Tafultong could decide that he's heard enough of your bullshit and call it quits. Then where will you go?
It's time you show Tafultong some respect.
"Substance, my friend. 99.8877 times out of 100 you write a descent blog. .1123 you play.
OMG!!!! I JUST HEARD RINGO SAY
"I AM A PHONEY!!!!"
Taf, don't let comments like these bother you. As an Iamaphoney fan you were only reacting to what you heads. I thought I heard "iamaphoney" as well.
"Substance, my friend. 99.8877 times out of 100 you write a descent blog. .1123 you play.
OMG!!!! I JUST HEARD RINGO SAY
"I AM A PHONEY!!!!"
Taf, don't let comments like these bother you. As an Iamaphoney fan you were only reacting to what you heard. I thought I heard "iamaphoney" as well.
Sorry. Nope. Taf must have went temporarily insane. It happens. Especially when you're wrapped up in this goofy project.
More fun for the kiddies:
http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/getback/88498/excuse-me-while-i-kiss-that-guy/
No Beatles or Paul solo on the list. Alright by me. If anything Iamaphoney NIR and this blog have made me sick of the Beatles and Paul McCartney. Maybe that was the intention all along. Give me some STP any day. Funny enough I'm not sick of psychos who worship this PID idiocy. Them I love.
"No Beatles or Paul solo on the list. Alright by me. If anything Iamaphoney NIR and this blog have made me sick of the Beatles and Paul McCartney. Maybe that was the intention all along. Give me some STP any day. Funny enough I'm not sick of psychos who worship this PID idiocy. Them I love."
You're an extremely unpleasant human being. I often wonder how it must feel to be so hateful. Surely you can't be happy, not nearly as happy as you want people to think you are. No, you must secretly be miserable, which is why you like to belittle and cause pain to others. We get it already; you're not a nice person. Now please go away, because no one really wants someone like you around (unless you change your attitude, which sucks, to be frank).
"1280x720 HD is just a couple of MB big
?!?!?!?! "just a couple"?
480 x 360 (fmt 18) the standard 4-6 minute clip is like 60 MB. "Just a couple" is a couple.
tip: the fmt parameter doesn't always miraculously make the video higher quality, only new videos uploaded in a hiqh quality format. The more you know...
In an O$X environment check for darwin's equivalent of a UNIX /tmp because in non-Windows environments the flash plugin writes to /tmp while your watching a video.
In Window$ (w/ Firefox) goto C:\Documents and Settings\{username}/Local Settings/Application Data/Mozilla/Firefox/Profiles/{more crap}/Cache while your watching watch a video.
Save any youtube flick on any os....
and while on the subject, people please quit posting links to youtube videos with just a: /watch?v=IAaPCr@p notation.
These arent youtube comments, blogger will allow you to post complete urls, so quit making me manually have to fill in the blanks. Those that are so in clined might be able to, if they try real hard, to acutally construct a valid anchor tag. IE: (A AHEF=youtube.com/watch?v=S0M3totAlcRAp)
oh wait. a majority of the people here are retarded, phoney to their age, and some even try to txt-type all cool n' hip n' shit.
proceed... Anyone need a beer while I'm up?
Muse! When we learned to
count, little did we know all
the things we could do
some day by shuffling
those numbers: Pythagoras
said "All is number"
long before he saw
computers and their effects,
or what they could do
by computation,
naive and mechanical
fast arithmetic.
It changed the world, it
changed our consciousness and lives
to have such fast math
available to
us and anyone who cared
to learn programming.
Now help me, Muse, for
I wish to tell a piece of
controversial math,
for which the lawyers
of DVD CCA
don't forbear to sue:
that they alone should
know or have the right to teach
these skills and these rules.
(Do they understand
the content, or is it just
the effects they see?)
And all mathematics
is full of stories (just read
Eric Temple Bell);
and CSS is
no exception to this rule.
Sing, Muse, decryption
once secret, as all
knowledge, once unknown: how to
decrypt DVDs.
Arrays' elements
start with zero and count up
from there, don't forget!
Integers are four
bytes long, or thirty-two bits,
which is the same thing.
To decode these discs,
you need a master key, as
hardware vendors get.
(This is a "player
key" and some folks other than
vendors know them now.
If they didn't, there
is also a way not to
need one, to start off.)
You'll read a "disk key"
from the disc, and decrypt it
with that player key.
You'll read a "title
key" for the video file
that you want to play.
With the disk key, you
can decrypt the title key;
that decrypts the show.
Here's a description
of how a player key will
decrypt a disk key.
You need two things here:
An encrypted disk key, which
is just six bytes long.
(Only five of those
are the _key itself_, because
"zero" marks the end.
So that's five real bytes,
and eight times five is forty;
in the ideal case,
forty bits will yield
just short of two trillion
possible choices!
Ian Goldberg once
recovered a key that long
in seven half-hours.
But his office-mate
David Wagner points out that
it's _impossible_
to achieve what the
DVD CCA seems
to want to achieve,
even by making
the key some reasonable,
"adequate" key-length:
There's no way to write
a "secure" software player
which contains the key
and runs on PCs,
yet somehow prevents users
from extracting it.
If the player can
decrypt, Wagner has noted,
users can learn how.)
This is a pointer,
"KEY", to those bytes, and when we're
done, they'll be clear-text.
Oh, the other thing!
Called "im", a pointer to six
bytes: a player key.
(Now those six bytes, the
DVD CCA says
under penalty
of perjury, are
its trade secret, and you are
breaking the law if
you tell someone that,
for instance, the Xing player
used the following:
Eighty-one; and then
one hundred three -- two times; then
two hundred (less three);
two hundred twenty
four; and last (of course not least)
the humble zero.)
We will use these few
internal variables:
t1 through t6,
unsigned integers.
k, pointer to five unsigned
bytes. i, integer.
So here's how you do
it: first, take the first byte of
im -- that's byte zero;
OR that byte with the
number 0x100
(hexadecimal --
that's two hundred and
fifty-six to you if you
prefer decimal).
Store the result in
t1. Take byte one of im.
Store it in t2.
Take bytes two through five
of im; store them in t3.
Take its three low bits
(you can get them by
ANDing t3 with seven);
store this in t4.
Double t3, add
eight, subtract t4; store the
result in t3.
Make t5 zero.
Now we'll start a loop; set i
equal to zero.
i gets values from
zero up to four; each time,
do all of these steps:
Use t2 for an
index into Table Two:
find a byte b1.
Use t1 for an
index into Table Three:
find a byte b2.
Take exclusive OR
of b1 with b2 and
store this in t4.
Shift t1 right by
a single bit (like halving);
store this in t2.
Take the low bit of
t1 (so, AND it with one),
shift it left eight bits,
then take exclusive
OR of that with t4; store
this back in t1.
Use t4 for an
index into Table Four:
find a byte and store
it back in t4.
Shift t3 right by three bits,
take exclusive OR
of this with t3,
shift this right by one bit, and
take exclusive OR
of this with t3,
shift this right by eight bits, and
take exclusive OR
of this with t3,
shift this right by five bits, and
(No exclusive OR!
Orange you glad I
didn't say banana?) take
the low byte (by AND
with two hundred and
fifty-five); now store this
into t6. Phew!
Shift t3 left eight
bits, take OR with t6, and
store this in t3.
Use t6 for an
index into Table Four:
find a byte and store
it in t6. Add
t6, t5, t4; store
the sum in t5.
Take t5's low byte
(AND t5 with two hundred
fifty five) to put it
in the ith byte of
the vector called k. Now shift
t5 right eight bits;
store the result in
t5 again. Now that's the
last step in the loop.
No sooner have we
finished that loop than we'll start
another; no rest
for the wicked nor
those innocents whom lawyers
serve with paperwork.
Reader! Think not that
technical information
ought not be called speech;
think not diagrams,
schematics, tables, numbers,
formulae -- like the
terrifying and
uniquely moving, though cliche,
Einstein equation
"Energy is just
the same as matter, but for
a little factor,
speed of light by speed
of light, and we are ourselves
frozen energy."
Einstein's formula
to convert from joules into
kilogram-meters
squared per second squared,
for all its power, uses
just five characters.
But Einstein wrote to
physicists: formal, concise,
specific, detailed.
And sometimes we write
to machines to teach them how
tasks are carried out:
and sometimes we write
to our friends to show a way
tasks are carried out.
We write precisely
since such is our habit in
talking to machines;
we say exactly
how to do a thing or how
every detail works.
The poet has choice
of words and order, symbols,
imagery, and use
of metaphor. She
can allude, suggest, permit
ambiguities.
She need not say just
what she means, for readers can
always interpret.
Poets too, despite
their famous "license" sometimes
are constrained by rules:
How often have we
heard that some strange twist of plot
or phrase was simply
"Metri causa", for
the meter's sake, solely done
"to fit the meter"?
Programmers' art as
that of natural scientists
is to be precise,
complete in every
detail of description, not
leaving things to chance.
Reader, see how yet
technical communicants
deserve free speech rights;
see how numbers, rules,
patterns, languages you don't
yourself speak yet,
still should in law be
protected from suppression,
called valuable speech!
Ending my appeal
on that note, I will describe
the second loop. Store
nine in i; i gets
values from nine down to
naught. Each time, do this:
Use i+1 as
an index into Table
Zero: find a byte.
Call that byte p1.
Now use i for an index
in Table Zero:
find a byte and
call that byte p0. Now
use p1 as an
index into k
(a vector, remember?); thus
find a byte b1.
Use p1 as an
index into KEY, as well:
find a byte, use that
byte as an index
into Table One. Call the
byte you find b2.
Use p0 as
an index into KEY to
find a byte b3.
Take exclusive OR
of b1, b2, b3,
and store that in KEY
(not just anywhere,
though!). In KEY at the byte that's
indexed by p1.
That's it for that loop
and also for the task of
disk key decryption.
Title keys are next.
It isn't hard to decrypt
one. The rule's the same!
Well, there's one slight
change: where you use t6, it's
Table "Five", not "Four".
And this time im is
the decrypted disk key, and
KEY the title key.
How would you like to
hear how to decrypt _both_ the
disk and title keys?
All we'll need are the
encrypted versions and a
player key. No sweat!
We'll call the title
key TKEY, a pointer to
six bytes, encrypted.
We'll call the disk key
DKEY, a pointer to six
bytes, encrypted too.
We will use a few
internal variables,
once again: so i,
an integer, will
serve again as loop index.
im1 is six bytes,
im2 is six bytes.
Both vectors and the latter
holds our player key.
Now I told you once
about a player key I
think they gave to Xing --
I don't know this for
sure; DVD CCA
said so in court, though.
Otherwise I'd say
that this is just a "magic
number" from on high,
vouchsafed to mortals
from the mouths of the Muses
for our benefit.
In reality
I'm told it was discovered
by M.o.R.E.,
some Europeans
two-thirds of whom are today
still anonymous.
I don't want to make
a long excursus right now
on why that's not bad:
reverse engineers
in many fields are heroes
of technology,
for advancing the
knowledge of their colleagues or
of the public mind.
Yet in software the
recent trend has been to brand
tinkerers as thieves!
I urge you to read
the Crypto-gram newletter
on why that's not so.
Bruce can make the point
better there than I can here,
sticking to haiku.
So this number is,
once again, the player key:
(trade secret haiku?)
"Eighty-one; and then
one hundred three -- two times; then
two hundred (less three);
two hundred twenty
four; and last (of course not least)
the humble zero."
If you didn't know
a valid player key, then
you could find one out --
ask Frank Stevenson,
or his fellow programmer
wise Andreas Bogk.
All we have to do
is this: copy our DKEY
into im1,
use the rule above
that decrypts a disk key (with
im1 and its
friend im2 as
inputs) -- thus we decrypt the
disk key im1.
Use the rule above
that decrypts a title key.
TKEY and our new
disk key im1
are inputs now -- we decrypt
TKEY, and we're done.
That was straightforward.
Probably we didn't need
to explain this part,
but computers are
very literal, so we
might as well do so.
This part is really
exciting for movie fans:
decrypt DVDs!
Well, at least sectors
of DVDs, but they are
made up of sectors.
Sectors (of two to
the eleventh bytes) are the
encryption units.
Rejoice then, get some
popcorn out, and butter if
you aren't vegan.
Margarine works well
if you're vegan, or if you
are watching your weight.
I've heard you can put
tarragon on your popcorn.
I haven't tried it.
Why did I tell you
to rejoice? Because we are
about to watch a
movie, at least if
we have a good MPEG-2
player close at hand.
We need two things now,
though, beyond our MPEG-2
players and popcorn:
A vector "SEC" of
two thousand forty-eight bytes,
disk sector contents.
(These start off in their
encrypted form, but we will
leave them decrypted.)
And a vector KEY
of six bytes, the decrypted
title key we'll use.
We will use these few
internal variables:
t1 through t6,
unsigned integers.
Remember those from before?
END is a pointer
to the end of the
sector, which is SEC plus two
thousand forty-eight.
Take the first byte of
KEY (that's byte zero), perform
exclusive OR with
byte eighty-four of
SEC. Treating the result as
an integer, take
OR of that with two
hundred fifty-six. Store the
result in t1.
Take the next byte (which
is byte one) of KEY, perform
exclusive OR with
the next byte of SEC
(byte eighty-five, right?); store the
result in t2.
Take bytes two through five
of KEY and take exclusive
OR of these with their
counterparts abroad,
bytes eighty-six through eighty-nine
of our sector SEC.
Store this in t3.
(It will fit because it is
four bytes, like t3.)
I must quote myself
because we're going to do
some things once again:
(Above, in the first
part, we talked about t3:)
"Take its three low bits
(you can get them by
ANDing t3 with seven);
store this in t4.
Double t3, add
eight, subtract t4; store the
result in t3."
(Now increment SEC
by one hundred twenty-eight!)
"Make t5 zero."
Now start a loop, and
do these things as long as SEC
doesn't equal END:
Use t2 for an
index into Table Two:
find a byte b1.
Use t1 for an
index into Table Three:
find a byte b2.
Take exclusive OR
of b1 with b2 and
store this in t4.
Shift t1 right by
a single bit (like halving);
store this in t2.
Take the low bit of
t1 (so, AND it with one),
shift it left eight bits,
then take exclusive
OR of that with t4; store
this back in t1.
(The step that's coming
up is _slightly_ different from
the original.)
Use t4 for an
index into Table Five:
find a byte and store
it back in t4.
Shift t3 right by three bits,
take exclusive OR
of this with t3,
shift this right by one bit, and
take exclusive OR
of this with t3,
shift this right by eight bits, and
take exclusive OR
of this with t3,
shift this right by five bits, and
(No exclusive OR!
Orange you glad I
didn't say banana?) take
the low byte (by AND
with two hundred and
fifty-five); now store this
into t6. Phew!
Shift t3 left eight
bits, take OR with t6, and
store this in t3.
Use t6 for an
index into Table Four:
find a byte and store
it in t6. Add
t6, t5, t4; store
the sum in t5.
(Again, here's a change
from the original steps:
please don't get confused.)
In Table One use
the byte SEC points to as an
index, get a byte
there, take exclusive
OR of that byte with the low
byte of t5; store
the result where SEC
points, and increment SEC by
one. This is all that
has changed in these steps.
And we're almost done! Now shift
t5 right eight bits;
store the result in
t5 again. That is the
last step in the loop.
Now I want a drink
(mnemonics in crypto poems
are great!); exercise
from singing so long
makes me thirst for a glass of
soda, slice of pie.
For this is the end
of the decryption process;
you can now go home.
But wait! I hear a
voice entreating me to stay:
"O, the Tables tell!"
Alas, I have not
as yet declared to you the
CSS Tables.
This is a major
issue, in that I don't know
what these tables _mean_:
our noble guide has
told us in outline what they
are for, or something
of their structure. But
to me, a humble poet
of mathematics,
they are opaque, they
are certain combinations
of ancient, noble
Number. Their inner
logic, aitia, telos,
still unknown to me.
Herein a clear free
speech question: would courts see fit
to muzzle me, then,
from speaking numbers,
technical data, which I
did not make and more
cannot memorize,
cannot explain in detail,
cannot understand?
I have these numbers.
They have meaning, this is clear:
else why suppress them?
I wish to speak or
let the Muse announce through me
Tables of Numbers.
Professor Moglen!
Help defend my right to share
these numbers with you!
You called the right to
speak with PGP like that
to use Navaho.
Help me then in my
haiku quest to share these bits,
and not be censored.
Preserve my right to
speak here, in this extreme, these
mystery Tables
the products, pieces
of technique, which but a very
few will understand.
Mary Jo White, the
United States Attorney
for S.D.N.Y.,
your logic erodes
any meaningful power
Internet speakers
would retain against
state censorship. Do you care?
Have you any shame?
Fight, brave amici,
with effective, functional
argumentation.
I'll try to help by
singing these octets, until
court orders forbid.
(Sad to say, I have
removed hyphens in numbers:
poetic license.)
Table Zero is:
Five, zero, one, two, three, four,
oh, one, two, three, four.
Table One is long:
two to the eighth power bytes.
Ready? Here they are:
Fifty one; then one
hundred fifteen; fifty nine;
thirty eight; ninety
nine; thirty five; one
hundred seven; one hundred
eighteen; sixty two;
one hundred twenty
six; fifty four; forty three;
one hundred ten; then
forty six; then one
hundred two; one hundred and
twenty three; then two
hundred eleven;
one hundred forty seven;
two hundred nineteen;
six; sixty seven;
three; seventy five; then one
hundred fifty; two
hundred twenty two;
one hundred fifty eight; two
hundred fourteen; then
eleven; and then
seventy eight; fourteen; then
seventy; then one
hundred fifty five;
eighty seven; twenty three;
ninety five; then one
hundred thirty; one
hundred ninety nine; then one
hundred thirty five;
two hundred seven;
eighteen; ninety; twenty six;
eighty two; then one
hundred forty three;
two hundred two; one hundred
thirty eight; then one
hundred ninety four;
thirty one; two hundred and
seventeen; then one
hundred fifty three;
two hundred nine; zero; then
seventy three; nine;
sixty five; then one
hundred forty four; then two
hundred sixteen; one
hundred fifty two;
two hundred eight; one; and then
seventy two; eight;
sixty four; then one
hundred forty five; sixty
one; one hundred and
twenty five; fifty
three; thirty six; one hundred
nine; forty five; one
hundred one; then one
hundred sixteen; sixty; one
hundred twenty four;
fifty two; thirty
seven; one hundred eight; then
forty four; then one
hundred; one hundred
seventeen; two hundred and
twenty one; then one
hundred and fifty
seven; two hundred thirteen;
four; seventy plus
seven; thirteen; then
sixty nine; one hundred and
forty eight; then two
hundred twenty; one
hundred fifty six; then two
hundred twelve; five; then
seventy six; twelve;
sixty eight; one hundred and
forty nine; eighty
nine; twenty five; then
eighty one; one hundred and
twenty eight; then two
hundred one; then one
hundred thirty seven; one
hundred ninety three;
sixteen; eighty eight;
twenty four; eighty; then one
hundred twenty nine;
two hundred; then one
hundred thirty six; then one
hundred ninety two;
seventeen; then two
hundred fifteen; one hundred
fifty one; then two
hundred twenty three;
two; seventy one; seven;
seventy nine; one
hundred forty six;
two hundred eighteen; then one
hundred fifty four;
two hundred ten; then
fifteen; seventy four; ten;
sixty six; then one
hundred fifty nine;
eighty three; nineteen; ninety
one; one hundred and
thirty four; then one
hundred ninety five; then one
hundred thirty one;
two hundred three; then
twenty two; ninety four; then
thirty; eighty six;
one hundred thirty
nine; two hundred six; then one
hundred forty two;
one hundred ninety
eight; twenty seven; then one
hundred seventy
nine; two hundred and
forty three; one hundred and
eighty seven; one
hundred sixty six;
two hundred twenty seven;
one hundred sixty
three; two hundred and
thirty five; two hundred and
forty six; then one
hundred ninety; two
hundred fifty four; then one
hundred eighty two;
then one hundred and
seventy one; two hundred
thirty eight; then one
hundred seventy
four; two hundred thirty; two
hundred fifty one;
fifty five; then one
hundred nineteen; sixty three;
thirty four; then one
hundred three; thirty
nine; one hundred eleven;
one hundred fourteen;
fifty eight; then one
hundred twenty two; fifty;
forty seven; one
hundred six; forty
two; ninety eight; one hundred
twenty seven; one
hundred eighty five;
two hundred forty nine; one
hundred seventy
seven; one hundred
sixty; two hundred thirty
three; one hundred and
sixty nine; then two
hundred twenty five; then two
hundred forty; one
hundred eighty four;
two hundred forty eight; one
hundred seventy
six; one hundred and
sixty one; two hundred and
thirty two; then one
hundred sixty eight;
two hundred twenty four; two
hundred forty one;
ninety three; twenty
nine; eighty five; one hundred
thirty two; then two
hundred five; then one
hundred forty one; then one
hundred and ninety
seven; twenty; then
ninety two; twenty eight; then
eighty four; then one
hundred thirty three;
two hundred four; one hundred
forty; one hundred
ninety six; twenty
one; one hundred eighty nine;
two hundred fifty
three; one hundred and
eighty one; one hundred and
sixty four; then two
hundred and thirty
seven; then one hundred and
seventy three; two
hundred twenty nine;
two hundred forty four; one
hundred eighty eight;
two hundred fifty
two; one hundred eighty; one
hundred sixty five;
two hundred thirty
six; one hundred seventy
two; two hundred and
twenty eight; then two
hundred forty five; fifty
seven; one hundred
twenty one; forty
nine; thirty two; one hundred
five; forty one; then
ninety seven; one
hundred twelve; fifty six; one
hundred twenty; then
forty eight; thirty
three; one hundred four; forty;
ninety six; then one
hundred thirteen; one
hundred eighty three; then two
hundred and forty
seven; one hundred
ninety one; one hundred and
sixty two; then two
hundred thirty one;
one hundred sixty seven;
two hundred thirty
nine; two hundred and
forty two; one hundred and
eighty six; then two
hundred fifty; one
hundred seventy eight; one
hundred seventy
five; two hundred and
thirty four; one hundred and
seventy; then two
hundred twenty six;
two hundred fifty five.
That's the whole Table.
Just when you thought it
was safe, here is Table Two,
which has the same length:
Zero; one; two; three;
four; five; six; seven; nine; eight;
eleven; ten; then
thirteen; twelve; fifteen;
fourteen; eighteen; nineteen; then
sixteen; seventeen;
twenty two; twenty
three; twenty; twenty one; then
twenty seven; then
twenty six; twenty
five; twenty four; thirty one;
thirty; twenty nine;
twenty eight; thirty
six; thirty seven; thirty
eight; thirty nine; then
thirty two; thirty
three; thirty four; thirty five;
forty five; forty
four; forty seven;
forty six; forty one; then
forty; forty three;
forty two; fifty
four; fifty five; fifty two;
fifty three; fifty;
fifty one; forty
eight; forty nine; sixty three;
sixty two; sixty
one; sixty; fifty
nine; fifty eight; fifty plus
seven; fifty six;
seventy three; then
seventy two; seventy
five; seventy four;
seventy seven;
seventy six; seventy
nine; seventy eight;
sixty four; sixty
five; sixty six; sixty plus
seven; sixty eight;
sixty nine; and then
seventy; seventy one;
ninety one; ninety;
eighty nine; eighty
eight; ninety five; ninety four;
ninety three; ninety
two; eighty two; then
eighty three; eighty; eighty
one; eighty six; then
eighty seven; then
eighty four; eighty five; one
hundred nine; then one
hundred eight; then one
hundred eleven; then one
hundred ten; then one
hundred five; then one
hundred four; one hundred and
seven; one hundred
six; one hundred; one
hundred one; one hundred two;
one hundred three; then
ninety six; ninety
seven; ninety eight; ninety
nine; one hundred and
twenty seven; one
hundred twenty six; then one
hundred twenty five;
one hundred twenty
four; one hundred twenty three;
one hundred twenty
two; one hundred and
twenty one; one hundred and
twenty; one hundred
eighteen; one hundred
nineteen; one hundred sixteen;
then one hundred and
seventeen; then one
hundred fourteen; one hundred
fifteen; one hundred
twelve; one hundred and
thirteen; one hundred forty
six; one hundred and
forty seven; one
hundred forty four; then one
hundred forty five;
one hundred fifty;
one hundred fifty one; one
hundred forty eight;
one hundred forty
nine; one hundred fifty five;
one hundred fifty
four; one hundred and
fifty three; one hundred and
fifty two; then one
hundred fifty nine;
one hundred fifty eight; one
hundred and fifty
seven; one hundred
fifty six; one hundred and
twenty eight; then one
hundred twenty nine;
one hundred thirty; then one
hundred thirty one;
one hundred thirty
two; one hundred thirty three;
one hundred thirty
four; one hundred and
thirty five; one hundred and
thirty seven; one
hundred thirty six;
one hundred thirty nine; one
hundred thirty eight;
one hundred forty
one; one hundred forty; one
hundred forty three;
one hundred forty
two; one hundred eighty two;
one hundred eighty
three; one hundred and
eighty; one hundred eighty
one; one hundred and
seventy eight; one
hundred seventy nine; one
hundred seventy
six; one hundred and
seventy seven; then one
hundred ninety one;
one hundred ninety;
one hundred eighty nine; one
hundred eighty eight;
one hundred eighty
seven; one hundred eighty
six; one hundred and
eighty five; then one
hundred eighty four; then one
hundred sixty four;
one hundred sixty
five; one hundred sixty six;
one hundred sixty
seven; one hundred
sixty; one hundred sixty
one; one hundred and
sixty two; then one
hundred sixty three; then one
hundred seventy
three; one hundred and
seventy two; one hundred
seventy five; one
hundred seventy
four; one hundred sixty nine;
one hundred sixty
eight; one hundred and
seventy one; one hundred
seventy; then two
hundred nineteen; two
hundred eighteen; two hundred
seventeen; then two
hundred sixteen; two
hundred twenty three; then two
hundred twenty two;
two hundred twenty
one; two hundred twenty; two
hundred ten; then two
hundred eleven;
two hundred eight; two hundred
nine; two hundred and
fourteen; two hundred
fifteen; two hundred twelve; two
hundred thirteen; two
hundred one; then two
hundred; two hundred three; two
hundred two; then two
hundred five; then two
hundred four; two hundred and
seven; two hundred
six; one hundred and
ninety two; one hundred and
ninety three; then one
hundred ninety four;
one hundred ninety five; one
hundred ninety six;
one hundred ninety
seven; one hundred ninety
eight; one hundred and
ninety nine; then two
hundred fifty five; then two
hundred fifty four;
two hundred fifty
three; two hundred fifty two;
two hundred fifty
one; two hundred and
fifty; two hundred forty
nine; two hundred and
forty eight; then two
hundred forty six; then two
hundred and forty
seven; two hundred
forty four; two hundred and
forty five; then two
hundred forty two;
two hundred forty three; two
hundred forty; two
hundred forty one;
two hundred thirty seven;
two hundred thirty
six; two hundred and
thirty nine; two hundred and
thirty eight; then two
hundred thirty three;
two hundred thirty two; two
hundred thirty five;
two hundred thirty
four; two hundred twenty eight;
two hundred twenty
nine; two hundred and
thirty; two hundred thirty
one; two hundred and
twenty four; then two
hundred twenty five; then two
hundred twenty six;
two hundred twenty
seven. That's the end of the
Table Two listing.
Table Three repeats
itself sixty-four times with
this eight-byte sequence:
Zero, thirty six,
seventy three, one hundred
nine, one hundred and
forty six, then one
hundred eighty two, and then
two hundred nineteen,
and last of all, two
to the eighth, less one (or two
hundred fifty five).
Dr. Touretzky
has a more concise account
of what Table Four
is for, and where it
comes from; but for now, I think
I will just list it:
Zero; one hundred
twenty eight; sixty four; one
hundred ninety two;
thirty two; then one
hundred sixty; ninety six;
two hundred twenty
four; sixteen; then one
hundred forty four; eighty;
two hundred eight; then
forty eight; then one
hundred seventy six; one
hundred twelve; then two
hundred forty; eight;
one hundred thirty six; then
seventy two; two
hundred; forty; one
hundred sixty eight; then one
hundred four; then two
hundred thirty two;
twenty four; one hundred and
fifty two; eighty
eight; two hundred and
sixteen; fifty six; then one
hundred eighty four;
one hundred twenty;
two hundred forty eight; four;
one hundred thirty
two; sixty eight; one
hundred ninety six; thirty
six; one hundred and
sixty four; then one
hundred; two hundred twenty
eight; twenty; then one
hundred forty eight;
eighty four; two hundred twelve;
fifty two; then one
hundred eighty; one
hundred sixteen; two hundred
forty four; twelve; one
hundred forty; then
seventy six; two hundred
four; forty four; one
hundred seventy
two; one hundred eight; then two
hundred thirty six;
twenty eight; then one
hundred fifty six; ninety
two; two hundred and
twenty; sixty; one
hundred eighty eight; then one
hundred twenty four;
two hundred fifty
two; two; one hundred thirty;
sixty six; then one
hundred ninety four;
thirty four; one hundred and
sixty two; ninety
eight; two hundred and
twenty six; eighteen; then one
hundred forty six;
eighty two; then two
hundred ten; fifty; then one
hundred seventy
eight; one hundred and
fourteen; two hundred forty
two; ten; one hundred
thirty eight; and then
seventy four; two hundred
two; forty two; one
hundred seventy;
one hundred six; two hundred
thirty four; twenty
six; one hundred and
fifty four; ninety; then two
hundred eighteen; then
fifty eight; then one
hundred eighty six; then one
hundred twenty two;
two hundred fifty;
six; one hundred thirty four;
seventy; then one
hundred ninety eight;
thirty eight; one hundred and
sixty six; then one
hundred two; then two
hundred thirty; twenty two;
one hundred fifty;
eighty six; then two
hundred fourteen; fifty four;
one hundred eighty
two; one hundred and
eighteen; two hundred forty
six; fourteen; then one
hundred forty two;
seventy eight; two hundred
six; forty six; one
hundred seventy
four; one hundred ten; then two
hundred thirty eight;
thirty; one hundred
fifty eight; ninety four; two
hundred twenty two;
sixty two; then one
hundred ninety; one hundred
twenty six; then two
hundred fifty four;
one; one hundred twenty nine;
sixty five; then one
hundred ninety three;
thirty three; one hundred and
sixty one; ninety
seven; two hundred
twenty five; seventeen; one
hundred forty five;
eighty one; then two
hundred nine; forty nine; one
hundred seventy
seven; one hundred
thirteen; two hundred forty
one; nine; one hundred
thirty seven; then
seventy three; two hundred
one; forty one; one
hundred sixty nine;
one hundred five; two hundred
thirty three; twenty
five; one hundred and
fifty three; eighty nine; two
hundred seventeen;
fifty seven; one
hundred eighty five; then one
hundred twenty one;
two hundred forty
nine; five; one hundred thirty
three; sixty nine; one
hundred and ninety
seven; thirty seven; one
hundred sixty five;
one hundred one; two
hundred twenty nine; twenty
one; one hundred and
forty nine; eighty
five; two hundred thirteen; then
fifty three; then one
hundred eighty one;
one hundred seventeen; two
hundred forty five;
thirteen; one hundred
forty one; seventy plus
seven; two hundred
five; forty five; one
hundred seventy three; one
hundred nine; then two
hundred and thirty
seven; twenty nine; then one
hundred and fifty
seven; ninety three;
two hundred twenty one; then
sixty one; then one
hundred eighty nine;
one hundred twenty five; two
hundred fifty three;
three; one hundred and
thirty one; sixty seven;
one hundred ninety
five; thirty five; one
hundred sixty three; ninety
nine; two hundred and
twenty seven; then
nineteen; one hundred forty
seven; eighty three;
then two hundred and
eleven; fifty one; one
hundred seventy
nine; one hundred and
fifteen; two hundred forty
three; eleven; one
hundred thirty nine;
seventy five; two hundred
three; forty three; one
hundred seventy
one; one hundred seven; two
hundred thirty five;
twenty seven; one
hundred fifty five; ninety
one; two hundred and
nineteen; fifty nine;
one hundred eighty seven;
one hundred twenty
three; two hundred and
fifty one; seven; then one
hundred thirty five;
seventy one; one
hundred ninety nine; thirty
nine; one hundred and
sixty seven; one
hundred three; two hundred and
thirty one; twenty
three; one hundred and
fifty one; eighty seven;
two hundred fifteen;
fifty five; then one
hundred eighty three; then one
hundred nineteen; two
hundred and forty
seven; fifteen; one hundred
forty three; and then
seventy nine; two
hundred seven; forty plus
seven; one hundred
seventy five; one
hundred eleven; then two
hundred thirty nine;
thirty one; then one
hundred fifty nine; ninety
five; two hundred and
twenty three; sixty
three; one hundred ninety one;
one hundred twenty
seven; two hundred
fifty five. And that's the end
of the fourth Table.
(You'll get Table Five
if you flip each bit in the
Table Four, supra.)
Have mercy on me,
Lord, and lesser judges, and
on Jon Johansen.
Anonymous said...
MikeNL said...
that SEANLENNON guy is actually named jeff. he contacted me some time ago and asked how to rip Don't Let Me Know.. so i gave him my extended mix.
February 12, 2009 10:54 PM
That's what I need!
How can I get that?
vince.
PS. Mike, you know, I'm a little disappointed that, after Ben's little 'blow-up' in the van, Jack & Sun just clammed up; they should'a said, "Well, what do you WANT, you little manipulative BITCH! "
February 13, 2009 6:53 AM
well, download Safari browser from Apple.
go to your video, add &fmt=18 or &fmt=22(if HD 1280x720) to the end of the link. then click enter
the go to Window>Activity and search for a link like this, the video is at least a couple of MB big, so look for that on the right:
http://v4.cache2.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?id=7a6669152e172757&itag=18&signature=C98CCD206F43E09BA49CAB81FDB0A09416973B48.278EFED647E7CB5E7ABFC467A0257EA17A6E5EF7&sver=2&expire=1234565114&key=yt1&ipbits=0
then double-click on that and the download screen opens. when the download is done you have an video.mp4 file which is playable on Quicktime/VLC.
: ]
---
about lost: i really enjoyed the episode, the time travel stuff is great!
M.
===
PS; anon, about the couple of mb's for HD 1280x720, you need to look at the text better:
" &fmt=22(if HD 1280x720) to the end of the link. then click enter. the video is at least a couple of MB big, so look for that on the right: "
i referred to both SD and HD quality.
it's not about the amount, but it is about finding the video in the long list of items so you can spot it easily.
If he's dead, thats the 3rd time this year.
Rockers like that never die...
Hey Taf, there is a new S3an video up.. Has the same shot of the guy walking to the right towards the start of the video.. Also he is featuring a Miles Deo video "Sub"...
are you building an enigma decoder, anonymuse?
Anonymous said...
To Vince and Mike: I've tried based on things I've read you guys posting about but I can't get into Lost. I just think it's convoluted nonsense.
Mark
February 13, 2009 3:12 PM
To tell you the truth, I can't blame you. I've been a home-body for quite a while, and I only started watching it 'coz I hit a writing 'snag', and was, at first, only watching it to get 'ideas'.And, the next thing you know, I WAS HOOKED! I'm not proud of it. I can only suggest it FROM THE BEGINNING, so, if you don't have free time; time without money, in a city where it's easy to spend money the second you leave the house, it's not gonna be for you. For me, I'm glad they've moved away from the 'soap-opera' aspect of the show, which is how most of the first season is like.
vince.
P.S. Tell me if any of you encounter any difficulties in reading it. I will be more than happy to paste the same transcription that the aforementioned acquaintance provided me when he sent the document.
Please do that!
I cant read a thing!
allofthemwitches said...
Hello. It has been awhile.
I believe I told a few of you that I would no longer be making new videos. To this I am trying to hold true. Therefore, in lieu of a new video I will share what I have found here where it can be viewed by true believers and disbelievers alike.
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/6504/tav00910tc1.jpg
Above is a photographed document sent to me by an old acquaintance who works at EMI. He somehow learned about my humble YouTube page and decided to throw me a bone. The text is difficult to make out, yes, but obviously that is because the photo was taken hastily and by light of a flashlight (torch, for all you brits in the room). Perhaps a few of you may be as intrigued by it as I am (though taking a look at some of the complaintive comments I see being posted about our dear old friend iamaphoney, I think not).
P.S. Tell me if any of you encounter any difficulties in reading it. I will be more than happy to paste the same transcription that the aforementioned acquaintance provided me when he sent the document.
February 14, 2009 7:27 AM
----
PLEASE DO!!!
sign here in blood,
JOHN W. LENNON
T
The Tavistock Insitute of HUMAN/Supernatural Research And Development
We the parties undersigned _____________music in THE GREAT CAUSE and will______________futher notice.
Sign here in blood.
John W. Lennon
Paul McCartney
Just a quick edit,
I think it says James Paul McCartney,
This is absolutely incredible, as it seems to tie in with the theory of Paul being assassinated by Tavistock/Illuminati,
And The Beatles being used as a source of mind control,
I'd love to see a clearer copy,
Incredible.
it's a bloody Valentine
This is absolutely incredible, as it seems to tie in with the theory of Paul being assassinated by Tavistock/Illuminati,
And The Beatles being used as a source of mind control,
I'd love to see a clearer copy,
Incredible.
"Oh mortal man! Is there nothing that you cannot be made to believe?"
Goofballs, first off, when something looks to incredible to be true, always assume you are being played. If you honestly believe some dude at EMI is sitting on the most explosive document of the past century, and that he just tosses it off to his friend to post on an obscure (sorry Taf) blog when it is worth millions of dollars (if genuine), you are a bit gullible. I like how the document suggests that there are so many participants in the Tavistock blood oath that its basically an ordinary form letter out of a bad movie "Sign here in blood" (as though this was done through the mail or something).
I also like how they are supposed to sign it in blood, which normally would be a messy thing, but both parties fill it out neatly on the line. And that for such a seemingly important agreement, there is not a separate one for Lennon and McCartney to sign on their own, and they sign it together, in the order of their songwriting credits.
And of course of all people to have a smoking gun relating to PID lore, you have Lennon and McCartney, as if they are the only two in the entire human race that would sign such a thing, and not, say, Elvis, or any physicist, etc. And what mind control did they accomplish? So I listen to Nowhere Man for two minutes and think, "That's a nice bass line and clever harmonies on that one," and then I go back to eating my Kraft Dinner. Please. Why is it that those who believe so much in mind control are the ones who seem to believe everything put in front of them?
Here is the text that the EMI acquaintance sent me along with it:
The Tavistock Institute of HUMAN/Supernatural Research and Development
We, the parties undersigned do solemnly devote
our souls to THE GREAT CAUSE and enlist ourselves
in the service of HIS LORDSHIP until further notice
Sign here in blood
JOHN W. LENNON
JAMES PAUL McCARTNEY
Make of that what you will.
For now, I will not share my own thoughts on this matter because I know all it will lead to are angry words from people who already thought I was insane for what I suggested about Polanski and Lennon. In other words, I'm only the messenger---don't shoot.
The Beatles, Tavistock.......here we go again.
Don't forget Theo Adorno.
TKIN begin again.
.....don't forget Innociente Clemente (Father Clem of Mary Help of Christians School, Tampa, Florida).
We, the parties undersigned do solemnly devote
our souls to THE GREAT CAUSE and enlist ourselves
in the service of HIS LORDSHIP until further notice.
Until further notice? That sounds dubious. Hey, AOTW, just who is this friend at EMI and what does he think about that note?
...you know....Father Clem...he wrote "Let It Be".
Who is Theo Adorno you ask?
He wrote all the Beatles songs...except for "Let It Be", which Father Clem wrote...... and he also wrote all the The Stones', The Dave Clark Five's, Pink Floyd's, etc.
What a talented and diverse individual he must have been!
Anybody really believe this crap?
Of course you do.
Until further notice? That sounds dubious. Hey, AOTW, just who is this friend at EMI and what does he think about that note?
He didn't tell me what he thought of the contract (at least that's what I guess it is...he never really told me what the photo is of), only that he thought I'd be interested. Neither did I speak with him personally. The photograph was mailed to me at my home address a long with a note of thanks (thanks for what? He didn't say..) on the back of which was written what I presume to be a transcription of what was printed on the page depicted in the all-too-blurry photograph.
I feel I should add that to me this photographed text is not necessarily suggesting that these two fellows had agreed to be part of some sort of mind control/brainwashing experiment, only that they agreed to be part of the "great cause" of "his lordship", whatever that means.
But the signing your name in blood thing, that's out of order no matter which way you look at it.
I feel I should add that to me this photographed text is not necessarily suggesting that these two fellows had agreed to be part of some sort of mind control/brainwashing experiment, only that they agreed to be part of the "great cause" of "his lordship", whatever that means.
Well, I think the blood part and the context suggests that "his lordship" is satan, although it could be Lord whomever was running EMI. If it's genuine, it might even be a joke thing that Lennon and McCartney sent to their bosses satirizing their contractual agreements.
Paul is bloody
If it's genuine, it might even be a joke thing that Lennon and McCartney sent to their bosses satirizing their contractual agreements.
I must admit, that sounds like something they would have done for a laugh.
Paul is very bloody.
We have an impostor in our midst.
allofthemwitches said...
Hello. It has been awhile.
I believe I told a few of you that I would no longer be making new videos. To this I am trying to hold true. Therefore, in lieu of a new video I will share what I have found here where it can be viewed by true believers and disbelievers alike.
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/6504/tav00910tc1.jpg
Above is a photographed document sent to me by an old acquaintance who works at EMI. He somehow learned about my humble YouTube page and decided to throw me a bone. The text is difficult to make out, yes, but obviously that is because the photo was taken hastily and by light of a flashlight (torch, for all you brits in the room). Perhaps a few of you may be as intrigued by it as I am (though taking a look at some of the complaintive comments I see being posted about our dear old friend iamaphoney, I think not).
P.S. Tell me if any of you encounter any difficulties in reading it. I will be more than happy to paste the same transcription that the aforementioned acquaintance provided me when he sent the document.
February 14, 2009 7:27 AM
If I had received a document concerning John Lennon, Paul McCartney, and the Institute Tavistock. I would not have posted it here but included it in the next episode of witches, which has not been discontinued. There will be more.
Your Friend,
http://www.youtube.com/user/aIIofthemwitches
Can anyone compare the signatures with some autographs or hand writing of John and Paul? Just to verifiy if it match.
Signed in blood? Who was the legal witness? Christopher Lee? lol
It looks like the validity of that document is bogus.
Anonymous said...
We have an impostor in our midst.
""
If I had received a document concerning John Lennon, Paul McCartney, and the Institute Tavistock. I would not have posted it here but included it in the next episode of witches, which has not been discontinued. There will be more.
Your Friend,
http://www.youtube.com/user/aIIofthemwitches
February 14, 2009 3:53 PM
"We have an impostor in our midst."
AOTW's channel says the same.
amazing how the blood is still red after all this years....fake
Oh well maybe the next move is to start a "Paul is a vampire" cult. No wonder all those concerts are at night!
H e r e
C o m e s
The
S U N KING.
Need I say more?
We have an impostor in our midst.
No, I'm afraid the only impostor here is you. You hacked into my YouTube account and now you've changed the password and you, YOU of all people (I know who you really are we both know whose side you really stand for) are claiming to be me. Hilarious. I suppose what you expect to do now is to try to defend myself, to try to convince everyone that I am who I say I am. But what futility that would be! You are in charge of the account now; you are allofthemwitches, and there is nothing I can say or do to convince anyone otherwise.
Fair enough. I am proud of the witches series; I feel like I've made a small yet noticeable impact on the PID community...that perhaps I've convinced a few people that there is far more to this than meets the eye. It will be very amusing to see how you handle it from here. How will the witches series forge on while under the authorship of a brand new "allofthemwitches"?
Have fun, but remember:
A pretty face may last a day or two, but pretty soon they'll see what you can do
- Roman Manson (allofthemwitches)
Are we supposed to believe Paul hacked into your YouTube account? Why would someone bother to do such a thing when they can simply create their own channel?
We have an impostor in our midst.
No, I'm afraid the only impostor here is you. You hacked into my YouTube account and now you've changed the password and you, YOU of all people (I know who you really are we both know whose side you really stand for) are claiming to be me. Hilarious. I suppose what you expect to do now is to try to defend myself, to try to convince everyone that I am who I say I am. But what futility that would be! You are in charge of the account now; you are allofthemwitches, and there is nothing I can say or do to convince anyone otherwise.
Fair enough. I am proud of the witches series; I feel like I've made a small yet noticeable impact on the PID community...that perhaps I've convinced a few people that there is far more to this than meets the eye. It will be very amusing to see how you handle it from here. How will the witches series forge on while under the authorship of a brand new "allofthemwitches"?
Have fun, but remember:
A pretty face may last a day or two, but pretty soon they'll see what you can do
- Roman Manson (allofthemwitches)
Dude, I seriously doubt anyone would care enough to hack into the account. Your ego is out of control.
A Phoney Said "No, I'm afraid the only impostor here is you. You hacked into my YouTube account......."
If that is the case, why not notify YouTube and get your account back?
I love it when folks claim there account was hacked....they were shut down by "The Powers To Be" etc.
BULLSHIT
I love it when folks claim there account was hacked....they were shut down by "The Powers To Be" etc.
BULLSHIT.
Welcome to the wonderful world of PID. A BS extravaganza. A place where BS is piled upon BS.
Welcome to the wonderful world of PID. A BS extravaganza. A place where BS is piled upon BS.
February 14, 2009 5:58 PM
LOL Isn't it grand!
The Tavistock document fakers might as well have signed it in feces.
Shirley Polanski says:
That's him all right, occifer!
I'm the real phoney around here, and don't you phorget it!
Lama Phoney
The Tavistock document fakers might as well have signed it in feces.
February 14, 2009 6:24 PM
Hey iamafunny, right there's an idea!
Make you a document, get some Hershey's Kisses (or even some turd if you dare), and practice up signing John and Paul's names.
Sounds like some good video material to me!
Get-R-Done!
I just got a huge boner. Wanna help?
christ wood
"Christ, Marx, Wood and Wei led us to this perfect day"
Post a Comment